SAN ANTONIO, TX —
OSHA Inspection: ARLON INNOVATIONS, INC.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of ARLON INNOVATIONS, INC. in 6110 RITTIMAN RD., SAN ANTONIO, TX 78218 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 348019969.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ARLON INNOVATIONS, INC.
- Site address
- 6110 RITTIMAN RD.
- City
- SAN ANTONIO
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78218
- Mailing
- 6110 RITTIMAN RD., SAN ANTONIO, TX 78218
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 326199
- Employees
- 50
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 B08
- Issued
- May 28, 2025
- Abate by
- Jul 1, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $7,093 · Current $4,256 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(b)(8): The employer did not ensure that ladders are used only for the purposes for which they were designed. On or about February 4, 2025, in line two, employees used portable ladders to access the drying ovens during maintenance and cleaning.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4255.8
- — Z (S) $7093
1910.146 C02
- Issued
- May 28, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $7,093 · Current $4,256 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(2):The employer did not inform exposed employees, by posting danger signs or by any other equally effective means, of the existence and location of and the danger posed by the permit spaces: On or about February 4, 2025, in the coating line areas, permit-required confined spaces were not marked or identified by other effective means to warn employees who are required to enter the space to clean the area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4255.8
- — Z (S) $7093
1910.146 C05 I C
- Issued
- May 28, 2025
- Abate by
- Jul 1, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $11,823 · Current $7,094 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(5)(i)(C): When the employer used the alternate procedures specified in 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(5)(ii) for entering a permit space, the employer did not develop monitoring and inspection data that supported the demonstrations required by paragraphs (c)(5)(i)(A) and (c)(5)(i)(B) of this section; On or about February 4, 2025, in the coating line areas, employees clean the process dryers, which are permit-required confined spaces, and the employer has not evaluated or documented the conditions of the space before entry of employees.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $7093.8
- — Z (S) $11823
1910.146 G01
- Issued
- May 28, 2025
- Abate by
- Jul 1, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $7,093 · Current $4,256 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(g)(1):The employer did not provide training so that all employees whose work was regulated by 29 CFR 1910.146 (permit required confined spaces) acquired the understanding, knowledge, and skills necessary for the safe performance of the duties assigned under 29 CFR 1910.146: On or about February 4, 2025, in the coating line areas, employees clean the process dryers, which are permit-required confined spaces, and the employer had not provided training to employees who enter to understand the hazards that are encountered.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4255.8
- — Z (S) $7093
1910.178 L06
- Issued
- May 28, 2025
- Abate by
- Jul 1, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $7,093 · Current $4,256 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6):The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l):The certification shall include the name of the operator, the date of the training, the date of the evaluation, and the identity of the person(s) performing the training or evaluation. On or about February 4, 2025, in the shop areas, the employer did not ensure that each forklift operator was evaluated and certified before using a forklift.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4255.8
- — Z (S) $7093
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 326199)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348019969.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.