BUFORD, GA —
OSHA Inspection: LUIS DONALDO MAYA HERNANDEZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LUIS DONALDO MAYA HERNANDEZ in 3000 GRAVEL SPRINGS RD LOT 72, BUFORD, GA 30519 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348028655.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LUIS DONALDO MAYA HERNANDEZ
- Site address
- 3000 GRAVEL SPRINGS RD LOT 72
- City
- BUFORD
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30519
- Mailing
- 5830 BUFORD HWY APT E4, NORCROSS, GA 30071
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jun 24, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,128 · Current $2,128
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure employees used eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a) Residential construction located on Lot #72: On or about 02/6/2025, the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards while operating pneumatic framing nail guns, in that protective eyewear was not provided while operating these tools at 200 PSI.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2128
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jun 24, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $3,547
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: a) Residential construction located on Lot #72, Roof: On or about 01/28/2025, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of 20-feet to the lower ground level, in that a fall protection system was not provided to employees engaged in roofing activities.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3547
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348028655.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.