Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: EDUARDO VALDEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EDUARDO VALDEZ in 134 WARRIOR COURT LOT 957 TWIN LAKES, HOSCHTON, GA 30548 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 348036666.

Watch Eduardo Valdez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Eduardo Valdez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
EDUARDO VALDEZ
Site address
134 WARRIOR COURT LOT 957 TWIN LAKES
City
HOSCHTON
State
GA
ZIP
30548
Mailing
3800 RIVERWOOD LANE APT F, ROSWELL, GA 30075
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2128.00 · Current $2128.00
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.   a) New construction located on Lot #957 at 134 Warrior Court, Hoschton, GA 30548, Second level decking: On or about 2/11/2025, the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards while operating pneumatic nail guns, in that protective eyewear was not provided while operating these tools at 100 PSI while engaged in framing activities.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2128

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2837.00 · Current $2837.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:    a) New construction located on Lot #957 at 134 Warrior Court,  Hoschton, GA 30548, Second level decking: On or about  02/11/2025, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of 10-feet, 6-inch to the lower ground level, in that a fall protection system was not provided to employees engaged in framing activities.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2837

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2837.00 · Current $2837.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:   a) New construction located on Lot #957at 134 Warrior Court, Lot #957, Hoschton, GA 30548, Second level decking: On or about 02/11/2025, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of 10-feet, 6-inch fall hazards to the lower ground level, in that the  extension ladder used for was not extended 3-feet above the landing.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2837

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348036666.