STATESBORO, GA —
OSHA Inspection: UZIAS HERNANDEZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of UZIAS HERNANDEZ in 224 SUNFLOWER CT., STATESBORO, GA 30459 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 348042722.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- UZIAS HERNANDEZ
- Site address
- 224 SUNFLOWER CT.
- City
- STATESBORO
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30459
- Mailing
- 2075 OLD REGISTER RD LOT 7, STATESBORO, GA 30458
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,837 · Current $1,702 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a):Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, was not protected by protective helmets. a) Jobsite: On or about February 12, 2025, the employer exposed employees to a struck by hazard, in that employees did not use hard hats where there were overhead hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1702.2
- — Z (S) $2837
1926.102 B01
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,837 · Current $1,702 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(b)(1): Protective eye and face protection devices must comply with any of the consensus standards identified in sections 1926.102(b)(1)(i)-(iii) of this standard. a) Jobsite: On or about February 12, 2025, the employer exposed employees to a struck-by hazard, in that the employer did not provide protective eye and/or face protection for employees that used pneumatic nail guns.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1702.2
- — Z (S) $2837
1926.304 D
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $2,128 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.304(d): When the tool was withdrawn from the work, the lower guard did not automatically and instantly return to the covering position. a) Jobsite: On or about February 12, 2025, the employer exposed employees to a struck-by hazard, in that employees used a circular saw with a pencil that prevented the guard from returning to the covering position.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2128.2
- — Z (S) $3547
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,837 · Current $1,702 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system. a) Jobsite: On or about February 12, 2025, the employer exposed employees to a fall hazard, in that employees did not use fall protection to perform roofing work on a residential house with a 10' fall to ground distance.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1702.2
- — Z (S) $2837
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,128 · Current $1,277 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to upper landing surfaces, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladders were used to gain access. a) Jobsite: On or about February 12, 2025, the employer exposed employees to a fall hazard, in that employees used a ladder that did not extend at least three feet above the upper landing surface to access the roof.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1276.8
- — Z (S) $2128
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were not used for the purpose for which they were designed. a) Jobsite: On or about February 12, 2025, the employer exposed employees to a fall hazard, in that employees worked from A-frame stepladders in the closed position.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B13
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step. a) Jobsite: On or about February 12, 2025, the employer exposed employees to a fall hazard, in that employees used the top of an 8' A-frame stepladder as a step to climb onto the roof.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Uzias Hernandez
View Uzias Hernandez's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348042722.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.