Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: NAVY EXCHANGE SERVICE COMMAND (NEXCOM)

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of NAVY EXCHANGE SERVICE COMMAND (NEXCOM) in BLDG. 1401 ROGERS RD, SAN DIEGO, CA 92135 (NAICS 721110). OSHA activity number 348044892.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Navy Exchange Service Command (Nexcom) — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Navy Exchange Service Command (Nexcom) is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
BLDG. 1401 ROGERS RD
City
SAN DIEGO
State
CA
ZIP
92135
Mailing
NASNI NAVY LODGE BLDG. 1401 ROGERS RD, SAN DIEGO, CA 92135
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
721110
Employees
86
Ownership type
D

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2025
Abate by
Mar 26, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Grinding machinery was not used with work rest(s) to support offhand grinding work. Work rests shall be kept adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one-eighth inch to prevent the work from being jammed between the wheel and the rest.  Gardener Shop: On or about February 14, 2025, the employer did not ensure that the Ryobi bench grinder work rest opening did not exceed one-eighths of an inch. This condition potentially exposed employees to amputation hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.303 G01 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2025
Abate by
Mar 26, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.303(g)(1)(ii): The required working space about electric equipment rated 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground, was used for storage:  Building 1401-A, Laundry Room: On February 14, 2025, the employer did not ensure that the working space in front of electrical panels was not used for storage. A linen cart was observed in front of several panels potentially exposing employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 C01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): The employer having employee(s) with occupational exposure did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure:  Navy Lodge: On or about February 14, 2025, the employer did not ensure that an exposure control plan was established to address the occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens for employees. This condition potentially exposed employees to Hepatitis B (HBV), Hepatitis C (HCV), and the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 F01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2025
Abate by
Mar 26, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(1)(i): The employer did not make available the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series to all employees who have occupational exposure:  Navy Lodge: On or about February 14, 2025 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not offer the Hepatitis B vaccine to the housekeeping staff that had occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens. This condition potentially exposed employees to Hepatitis B (HBV), Hepatitis C (HCV), and the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 F06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 17 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2025
Abate by
Mar 26, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.1200(f)(6): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the information specified under paragraphs (f)(6)(i) through (ii) of this section:  Maintenance Shop: On or about February 14, 2025, the employer did not ensure that a bottle of ZEP Calcium, Lime & Rust Remover was properly labeled with the product identifier and words, pictures and/or symbols. This condition potentially exposed employees to skin burns and/or eye damage.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.37 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 73 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(2): Exit routes were not arranged so that employees did not have to travel toward a high hazard area:  Bldg. 1401-A, Employee Lounge: On or about February 14, 2025, the employer did not ensure that an emergency exit did not lead through a high hazard area. One of the emergency exits in the employee lounge led to a laundry room with obstructions and double doors that opened inward potentially exposing employees to entrapment and fire hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  Navy Lodge: On or about February 14, 2025, the employer did not ensure that a respiratory program was established outlining worksite procedures for the use of respirators. This condition potentially exposed employees to respiratory related hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2025
Abate by
Mar 26, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1):  The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  Navy Lodge: On or about February 14, 2025, the employer did not ensure that employees who wore a respirator were medically evaluated to ensure a proper fit of their elastomeric respirator. This condition potentially exposed employees to respiratory related hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 K06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2025
Abate by
Mar 26, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:  Navy Lodge: On or about February 14, 2025, the employer did not ensure that employees wearing an elastomeric respirator were briefed on the hazards related to their use. This condition potentially exposed employees to respiratory related hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348044892.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.