Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GREENMOUNT CEMETERY ASSOCIATION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GREENMOUNT CEMETERY ASSOCIATION in 1701 SOUTH 12TH STREET, QUINCY, IL 62301 (NAICS 812220). OSHA activity number 348054321.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Greenmount Cemetery Association — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Greenmount Cemetery Association is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1701 SOUTH 12TH STREET
City
QUINCY
State
IL
ZIP
62301
Mailing
1701 SOUTH 12TH STREET, QUINCY, IL 62301
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
812220
Employees
14
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.28 B01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2025
Abate by
Jun 27, 2025
Penalty
Initial $6,620 · Current $3,310 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i):  Except as provided elsewhere in this section 29 CFR 1910.28, the employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that is 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level is protected from falling by one or more of the systems described in 29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i):  On or about February 20, 2025, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 12 feet while operating a chainsaw from the bucket of the John Deere Backhoe Loader because suitable fall protection was not being used.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3310
  • — Z (S) $6620

1910.30 A03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2025
Abate by
Jul 31, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.30(a)(3):  The employer did not train each employee in at least the following topics listed in 1910.30(a)(3)(i)-(iv):   On or about February 20, 2025, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 12 feet while operating a chainsaw from the bucket of the John Deere Backhoe Loader because fall protection training was not provided.  The employer must train each employee in at least the following topics: a.  The nature of the fall hazards in the work area and how to recognize them; b.  The procedures to be followed to minimize those hazards; c.  The correct procedures for installing, inspecting, operating, maintaining, and disassembling the personal fall protection systems that the employee uses; and d.  The correct use of personal fall protection systems and equipment specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, including, but not limited to, proper hook-up, anchoring, and tie-off techniques, and methods of equipment inspection and storage, as specified by the manufacturer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2025
Abate by
Jul 31, 2025
Penalty
Initial $6,620 · Current $3,310 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1):  The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment:  On or about February 20, 2025, employees were exposed to physical hazards while performing grounds maintenance duties including tree trimming and grass cutting and the employer had not assessed the workplace to determine if hazards were present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment (PPE).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3310
  • — Z (S) $6620

1910.135 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2025
Abate by
Jul 31, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.135(a)(1):  The employer did not ensure that each affected employee wear a protective helmet when working in areas where there is a potential for injury to the head from falling objects:  On or about February 20, 2025, employees were exposed to overhead hazards while performing tree trimming operations because the employer had not ensured hard hats were being worn.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.266 D01 IV

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2025
Abate by
Jul 31, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.266(d)(1)(iv):  The employer did not provide, at no cost to the employee, and/or assure that each employee who operated a chain saw wore ballistic nylon leg protection or other leg protection which the employer had demonstrated provides equivalent protection:  On or about February 20, 2025, employees were exposed to leg injuries while operating a chain saw because the employer had not ensured leg protection was being worn.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.266 D01 VII B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2025
Abate by
Jul 31, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.266(d)(1)(vii)(B):  The employer did not provide, at no cost to the employee, and ensure that each employee wear face protection meeting the requirements of subpart I of Part 1910 where there was potential for facial injury:  On or about February 20, 2025, employees were exposed to facial injuries while operating a chain saw because the employer had not ensured face protection was being worn.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2025
Abate by
Jul 31, 2025
Penalty
Initial $3,783 · Current $1,892 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):  The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  On or about February 20, 2025, employees were exposed to physical and chemical hazards while using Durex Antifreeze/Coolant, Conquer Biodegradable Emulsifier, Harvest King Tractor Hydraulic Fluid, Slime 2in1 Tire & Tube Premium Sealant and a written hazard communication program had not been developed and implemented.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1892
  • — Z (S) $3783

1910.134 K06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2025
Abate by
Jul 31, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:  On or about February 20, 2025, employees were provided respiratory protection for voluntary use and had not been provided with Appendix D of the standard either orally or in writing by the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348054321.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.