CARTHAGE, MO —
OSHA Inspection: J&N GRANITE
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of J&N GRANITE in 14184 BUTTERNUT LN, CARTHAGE, MO 64836 (NAICS 423320). OSHA activity number 348061581.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- J&N GRANITE
- Site address
- 14184 BUTTERNUT LN
- City
- CARTHAGE
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 64836
- Mailing
- 14184 BUTTERNUT LN, CARTHAGE, MO 64836
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 423320
- Employees
- 20
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 29, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,972 · Current $3,972
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1):A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: At the worksite located 14184 Butternut Lane Carthage MO: Employees were exposed to respiratory hazards. The employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory program. Employees are required to use half face respirators or dust masks during work tasks in the shop, including but not limited to cutting, polishing, and buffing granite and quartz countertops.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3972
1910.1053 G01
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 29, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(g)(1): Where respiratory protection was required by this section, the employer did not provide each employee an appropriate respirator that complied with the requirements of this paragraph and 29 CFR 1910.134: At the worksite located 14184 Butternut Lane Carthage MO: Employees were exposed to respirable crystalline silica. Employees performing tasks such as cutting, polishing, and grinding stone that contains respirable crystalline silica were not provided with respirators that complied with the requirements of the Respiratory Protection Standard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L02 II
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 29, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,270 · Current $2,270
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace. At the worksite located 14184 Butternut Lane Carthage MO: Employees were exposed to struck by and crushed by hazards. The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2270
1910.305 G01 IV A
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 29, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,270 · Current $2,270
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A):Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure: At the worksite located 14184 Butternut Lane Carthage MO: Employees were exposed to electrical shock and fire hazards. Employees in the shop used extension cords in lieu of permanent wiring for the buffing and polishing wheels.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2270
1910.1053 C
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 29, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,972 · Current $3,972
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(c):The employer did not ensure that no employee was exposed to an airborne concentration of respirable crystalline silica in excess of 50 ug/m3, calculated as an 8-hour TWA: At the worksite located 14184 Butternut Lane Carthage MO: Employees were exposed to chemical and respirable hazards in the form of respirable crystalline silica in excess of the OSHA Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) 50 ug/m3, calculated as an 8-hour TWA. This was shown in three employees: a.) One employee, a Saw Operator, had an exposure of 102ug/m3 with a sampling time of 229 minutes. The remaining un-sampled period of 251 minutes is assumed to have zero exposure. b.) One employee, a Foreman, had an exposure of 86.0 ug/m3 with a sampling time of 385 minutes. The remaining un-sampled period of 95 minutes is assumed to have zero exposure. c.) One employee, a Polisher, had an exposure of 67.6 ug/m3 with a sampling time of 383 minutes. The remaining un-sampled period of 97 minutes is assumed to have zero exposure.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3972
1910.1053 F01
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 29, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(f)(1):The employer did not use engineering and work practice controls to reduce and maintain employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica to or below the PEL, unless the employer can demonstrate that such controls are not feasible: At the worksite located 14184 Butternut Lane Carthage MO: Employees were exposed to respiratory hazards in the form of respirable crystalline silica. The employer did not use engineering and work practice controls to reduce employee exposure below the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) for respirable crystalline silica. This was recently shown on March 5, 2025, when three of five employees sampled had exposure levels greater than the PEL.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1053 F02 I
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 29, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,972 · Current $3,972
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(f)(2)(i): The employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan: At the worksite located 14184 Butternut Lane Carthage MO: Employees were exposed to respiratory hazards. The employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan when employees in the shop were occupationally exposed to respirable crystalline silica for more than 30 days a year.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3972
1910.1053 I01 I
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 29, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,972 · Current $3,972
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(i)(1)(i): The employer did not make medical surveillance available at no cost to the employee, and at a reasonable time and place, for each employee who was occupationally exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level for 30 or more days per year. At the worksite located 14184 Butternut Lane Carthage MO: Employees were exposed to respiratory hazards from respirable crystalline silica. Employees of the shop were exposed to levels of respirable crystalline at or above the action level for more than 30 days a year, and the employer did not make medical surveillance available at no cost to the employees.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3972
1910.1053 J02
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 29, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,405 · Current $3,405
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(j)(2): The employer did not post signs at all entrances to regulated areas that bear the following legend: DANGER RESPIRABLE CRYSTALLINE SILICA MAY CAUSE CANCER CAUSES DAMAGE TO LUNGS WEAR RESPIRATORY PROTECTION IN THIS AREA AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL ONLY At the worksite located 14184 Butternut Lane Carthage MO: Employees were exposed to respiratory hazards in the form of respirable crystalline silica. The employer did not post respirable crystalline silica warning signs at such a distance that employees may take protective steps before entering the regulated area marked by the signs.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3405
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 29, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,405 · Current $3,405
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: At the worksite located 14184 Butternut Lane Carthage MO: Employees were exposed to chemical hazards. The employer did not develop, implement and establish a hazard communication program. Employees are exposed to chemicals such as but not limited to respirable crystalline silica, propane, lacquer thinner, and binders, as well as carbon monoxide from a propane powered forklift and a wood stove.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3405
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 423320)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348061581.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.