PALM BAY, FL ·
OSHA Inspection: DARIENBRI INSTALLATION ASSOCIATION CORP
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DARIENBRI INSTALLATION ASSOCIATION CORP in 1576 KYLAR DRIVE NW, PALM BAY, FL 32907 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 348067133.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DARIENBRI INSTALLATION ASSOCIATION CORP
- Site address
- 1576 KYLAR DRIVE NW
- City
- PALM BAY
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32907
- Mailing
- 2337 KINGS CREST RD, KISSIMMEE, FL 34744
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238170
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Mar 11, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $1,774 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1):Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii) a) On or about February 26, 2025, at the jobsite: employees were exposed to a 10'4" fall hazard while working from a scaffold, in that the scaffold was not fully planked.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1773.5
- · Z (S) $3547
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- Mar 11, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $1,774 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2):Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, or uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation: a) On or about February 26, 2025, at the jobsite: employees were exposed to a 10'4" fall hazard while working on a two-tier scaffold, in that, the base plates were missing.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1773.5
- · Z (S) $3547
1926.451 C03
- Issued
- Mar 11, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(3):Supported scaffold poles, legs, post, frames, and/or uprights were not plumb and braced to prevent swaying and displacement: a) On or about February 26, 2025, at the jobsite: employees were exposed to a 10'4" fall hazard while working on a two-tier scaffold, in that, the frame was not plumb and braced to prevent swaying and displacement.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Mar 11, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $1,774 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section: a) On or about February 26, 2025, at the jobsite: employees were exposed to a 10'4" fall hazard while working from a scaffold, in that the scaffold was missing guardrails.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1773.5
- · Z (S) $3547
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Mar 11, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $2,483 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. a) On or about February 26, 2025, at the jobsite: employees were exposed to 10'4" fall hazard while working on a two-tier scaffold, in that, the scaffold was not plumb and braced, missing base plates and cross braces, and missing guardrails.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2482.5
- · Z (S) $4965
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Mar 11, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $1,774 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) On or about February 26, 2025, at the jobsite: employees were exposed to a 9'4" fall hazard while employees were installing windows on the roof of a house, in that, fall protection was not used.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1773.5
- · Z (S) $3547
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Mar 11, 2025
- Abate by
- Apr 25, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1):The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. a) On or about February 26, 2025, at the jobsite: the employer did not provide written fall protection training certification for employees exposed to a fall hazard of 9'4" while working on the roof and 10'4" while working from a two-tier scaffold that was missing guardrails, planks, and baseplates.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 348067133.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.