Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ARLINGTON EXTERIORS INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of ARLINGTON EXTERIORS INC. in 1503 W. HADDON AVE., CHICAGO, IL 60642 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 348069469.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Arlington Exteriors INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Arlington Exteriors INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1503 W. HADDON AVE.
City
CHICAGO
State
IL
ZIP
60642
Mailing
2335 OLD HICKS ROAD, LONG GROVE, IL 60047
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
12
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L04 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 12, 2025
Abate by
Jun 30, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,729 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:  a.  On or about February 27, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee was required to operate a powered industrial vehicle and had been provided with training that was more then three (3) years old, including but not limited to formal instruction, practical training and an evaluation of the operator's performance, thereby exposing employees to struck by and crushing hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4729

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 12, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,729 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:   a.  On or about February 27, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee working on the ground, below masonry activities, was not wearing a hard hat to protect against falling materials and debris.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $4729

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 12, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,729 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1):The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  a.  On or about February 27, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee using a portable partner saw, was not wearing safety glasses, thereby exposing the employee to the hazards associated with eye injuries.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $4729

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 10 exposed
Issued
May 12, 2025
Penalty
Initial $6,620 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.  a.  On or about February 27, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite an employee performing commercial masonry  operations, from a third floor, was not protected from falls, thereby exposing the employee to fall hazards.  b.  On or about February 27, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite an employee performing commercial masonry  operations, from a second floor window opening, was not protected from falls, thereby exposing the employee to fall hazards.  c.  On or about February 27, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite  employees performing commercial masonry  operations, were exposed to falls hazards, due to a south elevator shaft that did not have guardrails.  d.  On or about February 27, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite  employees performing commercial masonry  operations, were exposed to falls hazards, due to a north elevator shaft that did not have guardrails.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $6620

1926.701 B

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
May 12, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,729 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.701(b): All protruding reinforcing steel, onto and/or into which employees could fall, was not guarded to eliminate the hazard of impalement:  a.  On or about February 27, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, employees working on masonry operations, were exposed with ends of rebar that were not guarded, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with impalement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $4729

1926.1153 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 12, 2025
Abate by
Jun 30, 2025
Penalty
Initial $6,620 · Current $3,500 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1926.1153(c)(1): Specified exposure control methods. For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.   a.  On or about February 27, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee conducting masonry operations to include but not limited to; the removal/cutting up of masonry brick that contained Crystalline Quartz Silica, by use of a of a Stihl Partner Saw.  The employer did not implement engineering controls, thereby exposing employee to the hazards associated with silica.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $6620

1926.1153 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 12, 2025
Abate by
Jun 30, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1153(g)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan:   a.  On or about February 27, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee conducting masonry operations to include but not limited to; the removal/cutting up of masonry brick, by use of a of a Stihl Partner Saw.  The employer did not implement a written exposure control plan, thereby exposing employee to the hazards associated with silica.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1052 C01 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 9 exposed
Issued
May 12, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,729 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(i): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with at least one handrail:  a.  On or about February 24, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, the stairways from the first floor to the third floor, on the north end, were not provided with handrails, thereby exposing an employees to fall hazards.  b.  On or about February 24, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, the stairways from the first floor to the third floor, on the south end, were not provided with handrails, thereby exposing an employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $4729

View Arlington Exteriors INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348069469.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.