Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HILTON SUN, INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of HILTON SUN, INC. in 13615 FRONT BEACH ROAD, PANAMA CITY BEACH, FL 32413 (NAICS 721110). OSHA activity number 348071184.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Hilton SUN, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hilton SUN, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
HILTON SUN, INC.
Site address
13615 FRONT BEACH ROAD
City
PANAMA CITY BEACH
State
FL
ZIP
32413
Mailing
13200 PANAMA CITY BEACH PARKWAY UNIT B, PANAMA CITY BEACH, FL 32407
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
721110
Employees
20
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 2025
Abate by
Aug 15, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,220 · Current $2,532 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.132(d)(2):The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:  a) Facility wide:  On or about February 27, 2025, and at times prior to, the employer failed to verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification that identified the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and which identified the documents as a certification of hazard assessment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2532
  • — Z (S) $4220

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 2025
Abate by
Aug 15, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 21402260

29 CFR  1910.133(a)(1):Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment:  a)	Hotel Guest Room Areas:  On or about February 24, 2025, and at times prior to, the employer exposed employees to corrosive chemical hazards by not ensuring and requiring employees to wear eye protection when conducting drain opening work tasks using Instant Power Heavy Duty Drain Opener.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 2025
Abate by
Aug 15, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 21402260

29 CFR  1910.138(a):The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes.  a)	Hotel Guest Room Areas:  On or about February 24, 2025, and at times prior to, the employer exposed employees to corrosive chemical hazards by not ensuring and requiring employees to wear impervious chemical resistant gloves when conducting drain opening work tasks using Instant Power Heavy Duty Drain Opener.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 F06 II

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 2025
Abate by
Aug 15, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,220 · Current $2,532 Reduced

Hazardous substances 21402260

29 CFR  1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical.  a)	Casa Loma Maintenance Shop and Guest Room Areas:  On or about February 24, 2025, and at times prior to, the employer did not ensure all secondary containers were labeled with the hazard of chemical and name of contents of the chemical in a 16-ounce water bottle that contained corrosive Instant Power Heavy Duty Drain Opener used for maintenance work tasks such as unclogging drains.  b)	Casa Loma Maintenance Shop and Guest Room Areas:  On or about February 24, 2025, and at times prior to, the employer did not ensure all secondary containers were labeled with the hazard of chemical used for housekeeping work tasks in a 32-ounce spray bottle that contained 409 Cleaner.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2532
  • — Z (S) $4220

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 2025
Abate by
Aug 15, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 06401430

29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1):A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:   a)	Casa Loma Pool Area:  On or about February 27, 2025, and at times prior to, the employer provided and required the use of tight-fitting respirators to employees and does not have a written respiratory protection program in place.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 2025
Abate by
Aug 15, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 06401430

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a)	Casa Loma Pool Area:  On or about February 27, 2025, and at times prior to, the employer provided and required the use of tight-fitting respirators to employees and did not provide a medical evaluation before use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 2025
Abate by
Aug 15, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 06401430

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  a)	Casa Loma Pool Area:  On or about February 27, 2025, and at times prior to, the employer provided and required use of tight-fitting respirators to employees and did not ensure fit testing was conducted before use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 K03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 2025
Abate by
Aug 15, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 06401430

29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace:  a)	Pool Area:  On or about February 27, 2025, and at times prior to, the employer did not provide training on the use of tight-fitting respirators that are provided and required by the employer when handling pool chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348071184.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.