PRINCETON, TX —
OSHA Inspection: RICARDO AGUILAR
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RICARDO AGUILAR in 6722 TILLAGE DR., PRINCETON, TX 75407 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 348071382.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RICARDO AGUILAR
- Site address
- 6722 TILLAGE DR.
- City
- PRINCETON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 75407
- Mailing
- 5008 DILLEHAY DR, ALLEN, TX 75002
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- May 15, 2025
- Abate by
- Jun 11, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,837 · Current $1,288 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a):Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns: a) On or about February 27, 2025, at the jobsite, employee(s) were conducting framing work and some employee(s) on the ground level were passing lumber to other employee(s) working above them and the employee(s) at the ground level were not wearing protective helmets to protect them from falling lumber.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1288
- — Z (S) $2837
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- May 15, 2025
- Abate by
- Jun 11, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,837 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a) On or about February 27, 2025, Employees were employees were framing using pneumatic nail guns at a new amenities building and were exposed to eye injuries by not wearing safety glasses
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2837
1926.416 E01
- Issued
- May 15, 2025
- Abate by
- Jun 11, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $1,288 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(e)(1):Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used: (a) On or about February 27, 2025, workers were exposed to electric shock hazards when using damaged extension cords and portable electric powered equipment that was powered with visibly damaged cords.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1288
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 15, 2025
- Abate by
- Jun 11, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $1,288 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a. On or about February 27, 2025, 4 employees engaged in framing work without fall protection were exposed to unprotected fall hazards of approximately 14-feet to the ground below
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1288
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- May 15, 2025
- Abate by
- Jun 11, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. (a) On or about February 27, 2025, Employees were accessing the second level of the amenities building and did not have a ladders that extended 3 feet about the upper level.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4965
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348071382.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.