MESQUITE, TX —
OSHA Inspection: JOSE DE JESUS
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOSE DE JESUS in 1805 SUMMER AURA, MESQUITE, TX 75149 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348073388.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JOSE DE JESUS
- Site address
- 1805 SUMMER AURA
- City
- MESQUITE
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 75149
- Mailing
- 113 E. AVENUE F, GARLAND, TX 75040
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Apr 9, 2025
- Abate by
- May 5, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,256 · Current $4,256
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: (a) On or about February 27, 2025, employees were doing roof work on a single-family unit and were using a Zeluga nail gun but were not wearing safety glasses.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4256
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Apr 9, 2025
- Abate by
- May 5, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems, nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: (a) On or about February 27, 2025, employees were doing roof work on a single family two (2) story high unit and were not using a fall protection system.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Apr 9, 2025
- Abate by
- May 5, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: On or about February 27, 2025, employees were doing roof work on a single family two (2) stories high house and were using extension ladders that did not extend 3-feet above the landing of the roof.: (a) 32-feet extension ladder at the West side (side) of the house. (b) 32-feet extension ladder at the South side (front) of the house
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4965
More inspections at Jose DE Jesus
View Jose DE Jesus's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348073388.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.