Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ATKINS BUILDING GROUP INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ATKINS BUILDING GROUP INC. in 1641 NORTH HONEYSUCKLE CIRCLE, DE PERE, WI 54115 (NAICS 236116). OSHA activity number 348076555.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Atkins Building Group INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Atkins Building Group INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1641 NORTH HONEYSUCKLE CIRCLE
City
DE PERE
State
WI
ZIP
54115
Mailing
2050 SWEET FERN DR., GREEN BAY, WI 54313
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236116
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2025
Abate by
May 9, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,256 · Current $2,128 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.21(b)(2): The employer shall instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury.  a) On or about February 24, 2025, at the worksite located at 1641 North Honeysuckle Circle, De Pere, Wisconsin, the employer did not ensure that a competent person was performing frequent and regular inspections that could have recognized the fall from elevation hazards. Subcontractor employees were exposed to fall hazards while performing residential construction work on a roof without fall protection and working on a platform without guardrails. The eave height of the roof was greater than 11 feet above a lower level and the roof pitch was approximately 6/12.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2128
  • — Z (S) $4256

1926.451 G04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2025
Abate by
May 9, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems shall be installed along all open sides and ends of platforms. Guardrail systems shall be installed before the scaffold is released for use by employees other than erection/dismantling crews.  a) On or about February 24, 2025, at the worksite located at 1641 North Honeysuckle Circle, De Pere, Wisconsin; the employer did not ensure that a subcontractor employee exposed to fall hazards of over 11 feet while conducting work on a platform was protected by a guardrail system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2025
Abate by
May 9, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  a) On or about February 24, 2025, at the worksite located at 1641 North Honeysuckle Circle, De Pere, Wisconsin; the employer did not ensure that each subcontractor employee performing framing work was protected from falls, exposing subcontractor employees to fall hazards. The eave height of the roof was greater than 11 feet and the roof pitch was approximately 6/12.  Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Atkins Building Group INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348076555.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.