MILWAUKEE, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: EDGAR ROSADOS
Programmed Other inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a programmed Other safety inspection of EDGAR ROSADOS in 4071 NORTH 6TH STREET, MILWAUKEE, WI 53209 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348097155.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- EDGAR ROSADOS
- Site address
- 4071 NORTH 6TH STREET
- City
- MILWAUKEE
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53209
- Mailing
- 4091 NORTH 7TH STREET, MILWAUKEE, WI 53209
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Programmed Other (K)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- May 1, 2025
- Abate by
- May 28, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $3,547
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): Such programs shall provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers. (a) On or about March 10, 2025, the employer did not ensure that the competent person was conducting frequent and regular inspections of the job site to ensure appropriate fall protection was being worn and fall protection systems were installed properly, and that ladders were installed properly.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $3547
1926.501 B11
- Issued
- May 1, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,015 · Current $3,015
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: (a) On or about March 10, 2025, two employees performing tear off work on the south side of an existing residential roof with a 12:12 pitch, were using body belts in leu of full body harnesses and fall arrest system. This exposed employees to a fall hazard of approximately 25 feet from roof to the ground below. (b) On or about March 10, 2025, an employee performing tear off work on the north side of an existing residential roof with a 12:12 pitched, was using a body belt in leu of full body harness and fall arrest system. This exposed employees to a fall hazard of approximately 25 feet from roof to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $3015
1926.502 D17
- Issued
- May 1, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17): The attachment point of the body belt shall be located in the center of the wearer's back. The attachment point of the body harness shall be located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head. (a) On or about March 10, 2025, three employees performing tear off work on the south side and north side of an existing residential roof with a 12:12 pitched, were using body belts and connected the lines to the hip d-rings.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- May 1, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: (a) On or about March 10, 2025, employees performing tear off work on an existing residential home, used two (2) Aluminum extension ladders to access the roof. The extension ladder from the balcony to the roof was not erected three (3) feet above the upper landing or secured to the structure.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4965
1926.1053 B06
- Issued
- May 1, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6): Ladders shall be used only on stable and level surfaces unless secured to prevent accidental displacement. (a) On or about March 10, 2025, employees performing tear off work on an existing residential home, used an Aluminum extension ladder from the balcony to the roof that was on the slope of the gable, and which was not on a stable surface to prevent accidental displacement, exposing employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- May 1, 2025
- Abate by
- May 20, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify fall protection training by preparing a written certification record. (a) On or about March 10, 2025, the employer did not verify fall protection training by preparing a written certification record when employees were trained on fall protection and the hazards associated with the work being performed.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 348097155.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.