Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RICHARD L. HUNTLEY

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of RICHARD L. HUNTLEY in HILLTOP TERRACE, RANGELEY, ME 04970 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 348104308.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Richard L. Huntley — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Richard L. Huntley is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
RICHARD L. HUNTLEY
Site address
HILLTOP TERRACE
City
RANGELEY
State
ME
ZIP
04970
Mailing
21 WHITE BIRCH LANE, RANGELEY, ME 04970
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236115
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):  Work Site Scaffold - The employer failed to ensure the scaffold used to access the ridge board was fully planked while employees were standing upon it connecting rafters.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling, or alteration:  Work Site Scaffold - The employer failed to ensure the scaffold used to access the ridge board was erected by trained and experienced employees under the direct supervision of a competent person.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F14

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(14): Makeshift devices, such as boxes and barrels, shall not be used on top of scaffold platforms to increase the working level height of employees:  Work Site Scaffold - The employer did not ensure that the employee using the scaffold to access the ridge board did not use materials on top of the scaffold to increase the working height.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)(vii) of this section:  Work Site Scaffold - The employer failed to ensure an employee working on a scaffold approximately 15 feet above a lower level was protected from falls by the use of fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2025
Abate by
May 14, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards:  Work Site Scaffold - The employer failed to provide training to an employee working from a scaffold to ensure the employee recognized and understood methods to control hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.100 A

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2025
Abate by
May 7, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.100(a):Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  Hilltop Drive, Rangeley, Maine: The employer failed to provide hardhats to employees who were working at ground level while others worked above on scaffolds and roofs.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.200 H01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2025
Abate by
Jun 5, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.200(h)(1):  Accident prevention tags were not used a temporary means of warning employees of an existing hazard, such as defective tools, equipment, etc.  Hilltop Drive, Rangeley, Maine: On or about March 12, 2025, the employer failed to place an accident prevention tag on an unguarded table saw and a personnel basket missing one or more guard rails, attached to a rough terrain forklift, to prevent employees from using these pieces of defective equipment.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348104308.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.