Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: J.E.M. TRAFFIC CONTROL II CORP.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of J.E.M. TRAFFIC CONTROL II CORP. in 4925 N. LINCOLN AVENUE, CHICAGO, IL 60612 (NAICS 237310). OSHA activity number 348106766.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch J.E.M. Traffic Control II Corp. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for J.E.M. Traffic Control II Corp. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4925 N. LINCOLN AVENUE
City
CHICAGO
State
IL
ZIP
60612
Mailing
2060 W. LAKE STREET, CHICAGO, IL 60612
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
237310
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2025
Abate by
Nov 5, 2025
Penalty
Initial $319 · Current $319
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:   J.E.M. Traffic Control II Corp., failed to certify to OSHA within 10 calendar days after the abatement date that each of the following cited violations had been corrected:   Citation Number            Item Number                    Abatement Date  01                                01a                                   08/13/2025  01                                01b                                   08/13/2025  01                                01c                                   08/13/2025  01                                02a                                   08/13/2025  01                                02b                                   08/13/2025  01                                03                                      08/13/2025  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF THE CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $319

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2025
Abate by
Aug 13, 2025
Penalty
Initial $3,972 · Current $3,972

Hazardous substances S103

29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which described how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) would be met:  a) On or about March 13, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not develop or implement a written hazard communication program in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.1200 that describes at least the following:  1) Requirement for labeling of containers of hazardous chemicals: 2) Training of employees; 3) A complete list of hazardous chemicals known to be in the workplace; 4) Methods to inform employees of the hazards of non-routine tasks; and, 5) Methods to inform other employer(s) of material safety data sheets availability; the labeling system and any precautionary measures to protect employees.  Employees were exposed to paint and 8% of respirable crystalline silica (Quartz) when using a EDCO CPM-8-9H scarifier to remove traffic lines from the road.  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3972

1926.1153 I01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2025
Abate by
Aug 13, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances S103

29 CFR  1926.1153(i)(1): The employer did not include respirable crystalline silica in the program established to comply with the hazard communication standard (29 CFR 1910.1200):    a) On or about March 13,2025, J.E.M. Traffic Control II Corp. did not include respirable crystalline silica in the program established to comply with the hazard communication standard (29 CFR 1910.1200). Employees were exposed to crystalline silica when removing traffic lines from a road  using a  EDCO CPM-8-9H scarifier.  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 I02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2025
Abate by
Aug 13, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances S103

29 CFR  1926.1153(i)(2)(i):  The employer did not ensure that each covered employee could demonstrate knowledge and understanding of at least the information contained in paragraphs (A) - (F) of this section.  a) On or about March 13, 2025,  at the above mentioned address,  the employer did not ensure that each employee was trained on the health hazards associated with silica, specific tasks where exposure could occur, protective measures including respiratory protection, work practices, and engineering controls, and the identity of the competent person. Employees were exposed to crystalline silica when removing road traffic lines containing up 8% crystalline silica (Quartz).  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2025
Abate by
Aug 13, 2025
Penalty
Initial $3,972 · Current $3,972

Hazardous substances S103

29 CFR  1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified in Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.   a) On or about March 13, 2025 at the above mentioned address, employees of  J.E.M. Traffic Control II Corp. did not implement engineering controls and work practices, as specified in Table 1. Employees used a EDCO CPM-8-9H scarifier to remove traffic lines containing up to 8% of respirable crystalline silica (Quartz) without equipping the tool with a water delivery system that supplies a continuous stream or spray of water at the point of impact or a tool equipped with a commercially available shroud and dust collection system.  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3972

1926.1153 D02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2025
Abate by
Aug 13, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances S103

29 CFR  1926.1153(d)(2)(i):  The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section:  a) On or about March 13, 2025  at the above mentioned address, J.E.M. Traffic Control II Corp. did not assess the exposure of employees to respirable crystalline silica when removing traffic lines from a road containing up to 8% respirable crystalline silica (Quartz).  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2025
Abate by
Aug 13, 2025
Penalty
Initial $3,972 · Current $3,972

Hazardous substances S103

29 CFR  1926.1153(g)(1): The employer did not established and implement a written exposure control plan that consists at least the following elements:  (i) A description of the tasks in the workplace that involve exposure to respirable crystalline silica; (ii) A description of the engineering controls used to limit employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica for each task; (iii) A description of the housekeeping measures used to limit employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica ; and (iv)  A description of the procedures used to restrict access to work areas, when necessary, to minimize the number of employees exposed to respirable crystalline silica and their level of exposure.  a)   On or about March 13, 2025  at the above mentioned address, J.E.M. Traffic Control II Corp. did not develop and implement a Silica Exposure Control Plan with an accurate description of all the tasks in the workplace that involved exposure to respirable crystalline silica. Employees were exposed to dust containing up to 8% respirable crystalline silica (Quartz) when removing traffic lines fusing a EDCO- CPM-8-9HP scarifier from a road.  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3972

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348106766.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.