Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: NICODEMO CAAL ICO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of NICODEMO CAAL ICO in 6925 GASPAR TR, WEST CHESTER, OH 45069 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348110784.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Nicodemo Caal ICO — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Nicodemo Caal ICO is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
NICODEMO CAAL ICO
Site address
6925 GASPAR TR
City
WEST CHESTER
State
OH
ZIP
45069
Mailing
929 GLASGOW DR, CINCINNATI, OH 45240
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 2, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $3,476 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(2): Accident prevention responsibilities. Such programs shall provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers.  a) On or about March 13, 2025, the employer did not adequate conduct inspections of the job site. As a result, employees were exposed to fall heights greater than 12 feet in that conventional fall protection was not being worn while performing roofing work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3475.5
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 2, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a) On or before March 13, 2025, the employer failed to ensure that employees performing roofing on a residential home were utilizing a fall protection system. As a result, employees were exposed to fall heights greater than 23 ft.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 2, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,256 · Current $2,128 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1):When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.  a) On or about March 13, 2025, the employer did not ensure that employees exposed to a fall hazard were protected in that the portable ladder used for accessing the roof only extended 2 ft above the upper landing surface and was not secured from falling.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2128
  • — Z (S) $4256

View Nicodemo Caal ICO's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348110784.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.