Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: STORM TROOPERS LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of STORM TROOPERS LLC in 1851 18TH AVENUE, KENOSHA, WI 53140 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348114240.

Watch Storm Troopers LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Storm Troopers LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
STORM TROOPERS LLC
Site address
1851 18TH AVENUE
City
KENOSHA
State
WI
ZIP
53140
Mailing
1805 SOUTH AUSTIN BLVD., CICERO, IL 60804
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 6 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $398.00 · Current $398.00
29 CFR  1903.19(c)(1):The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated.  (a) Citation 1, Item 1, a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2) with an abatement date of May 14. 2025. (b) Citation 1, Item 2, a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) with an abatement date of May 14. 2025. (c) Citation 1, Item 3, a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1) with an abatement date of May 14. 2025. (d) Citation 1, Item 4, a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) with an abatement date of May 14. 2025. (e) Citation 1, Item 5, a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.100(a) with an abatement date of May 14. 2025. (f) Citation 1, Item 6, a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1) with an abatement date of May 14. 2025.  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERFICATIONS OF THE CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • — C (O) $398
  • — Z (O) $398

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2128.00 · Current $2128.00
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s).  (a) On or about March 18, 2025, the employer had not ensured that frequent jobsite inspections were conducted by a competent person(s) to identify and correct common safety hazards that employees were exposed to. Hazards identified during the inspection included but were not limited to, fall protection not being utilized while working at heights, installation of ladder used to access and egress the residential roof, and safety glasses not worn while using pneumatic nail guns.
Recent events (2)
  • — C (S) $2128
  • — Z (S) $2128

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2837.00 · Current $2837.00
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  (a) On or about March 18, 2025, the employer had not ensured an employee was wearing safety glasses while using a pneumatic nail gun, thereby exposing the employee to eye injury from flying projectiles.
Recent events (2)
  • — C (S) $2837
  • — Z (S) $2837

1926.416 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3547.00 · Current $3547.00
29 CFR  1926.416(a)(1): The employer permitted employees to work in close proximity to energized, unguarded, and ungrounded electric power circuits that the employee could contact in the course of their work.  (a) On or about March 18, 2025, the employer had not ensured that employees tasked staging material and performing tear-off on the roof of the residential structure were protected from the energized, unguarded, and unmarked electrical supply line. Exposing employees to an electrical shock hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — C (S) $3547
  • — Z (S) $3547

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2837.00 · Current $2837.00
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b).  (a) On or about March 18, 2025, employees conducting roofing work on an existing residential roof with a 4:12 pitch were not protected from falling to the lower level. Exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately nine feet to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
  • — C (S) $2837
  • — Z (S) $2837

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3547.00 · Current $3547.00
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  (a) On or about march 18, 2025, the employer had not ensured that employees exposed to potential fall hazards had been trained to recognize and minimize the fall hazard associated with their work.
Recent events (2)
  • — C (S) $3547
  • — Z (S) $3547

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2837.00 · Current $2837.00
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed.  (a) On or about March 18, 2025, the employer had not ensured the ladder used to access the residential roof extended at least three feet above the upper landing nor was it secured to prevent displacement while used. Exposing the employees to a fall hazard of approximately nine feet onto concrete.
Recent events (2)
  • — C (S) $2837
  • — Z (S) $2837

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348114240.