RENSSELAER, NY —
OSHA Inspection: HM PLUMBING GROUP LLC
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of HM PLUMBING GROUP LLC in 20 HERRICK STREET, RENSSELAER, NY 12144 (NAICS 238220). OSHA activity number 348148297.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HM PLUMBING GROUP LLC
- Site address
- 20 HERRICK STREET
- City
- RENSSELAER
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 12144
- Mailing
- 1653 BALLTOWN ROAD, NISKAYUNA, NY 12309
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238220
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 G04 XV
- Issued
- May 20, 2025
- Abate by
- May 27, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,015 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(xv): Crossbracing used in place of a midrail was unacceptable because the crossing point of two braces is between 20 inches (0.5 m) and 30 inches (0.8 m) above the work platform or as a toprail when the crossing point of two braces is not between 20 inches (0.5 m) and 30 inches (0.8 m) above the work platform or as a toprail when the crossing point of two braces is between 38 inches (0.97 m) and 48 inches (1.3 m) above the work platform; and the endpoints at each upright were more than 48 inches (1.3 m) apart: a) Worksite, stair scaffold, 2nd tier: On or about 4/1/25, employees who were conducting plumbing work were using a stair scaffold to access the roof. The second tier of the scaffold is approximately 12' above the ground and the crossbracing was being used as a toprail as the crossing point of the braces were approximately 38.25" above the work platform. A midrail was not installed on the scaffold and employees were exposed to a fall hazard. b) Worksite, stair scaffold, 3rd tier: On or about 4/1/25, employees who were conducting plumbing work were using a stair scaffold to access the roof. The third tier of the scaffold is approximately 18' above the ground and the crossbracing was being used as a toprail as the crossing point of the braces were approximately 38.25" above the work platform. A midrail was not installed on the scaffold and employees were exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1959.8
- — Z (S) $3015
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- May 20, 2025
- Abate by
- May 27, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,220 · Current $2,743 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system; or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system: a) Worksite, roof: On or about 4/1/2025, employees were conducting plumbing activities on a flat roof, approximately 26 feet above the ground, and were not protected from falls when accessing the roof using a stair scaffold. The roof did not have a guardrail system, personal fall arrest system, or combination with a warning line system when employees access the roof using a stair scaffold. b) Worksite, stair scaffold: On or about 4/1/2025, employees were accessing a stair scaffold from the roof, approximately 26' above the ground, and were not protected from falls. The roof did not have a guardrail system, personal fall arrest system, or combination with a warning line system when employees access the stair scaffold from the roof.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2743
- — Z (S) $4220
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238220)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348148297.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.