MILFORD, DE —
OSHA Inspection: RUBIO DRYWALL
Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of RUBIO DRYWALL in 701 NORTH DUPONT BLVD SUITE C, B, A, MILFORD, DE 19963 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 348154279.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RUBIO DRYWALL
- Site address
- 701 NORTH DUPONT BLVD SUITE C, B, A
- City
- MILFORD
- State
- DE
- ZIP
- 19963
- Mailing
- 850 FRENCHTOWN ROAD, ELKTON, MD 21921
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Other (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238310
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.453 B02 II
- Issued
- Sep 24, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,405 · Current $2,384 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(ii): Only authorized persons shall operate an aerial lift. a) Suite A, B & C, 701 N. Dupont Blvd, Milford, DE 19963: On or about April 2, 2025, unauthorized operators were permitted to use a JLG 460SJ aerial lift to perform siding installation work.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2383.5
- — Z (S) $3405
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Sep 24, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,405 · Current $2,384 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v):A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift: Note: As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated a) Suite A, B & C, 701 N. Dupont Blvd, Milford, DE 19963: On or about April 2, 2025, employee was exposed to fall hazards when the employer did not ensure the employee was wearing a properly secured harness and lanyard while operating a JLG Lift.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2383.5
- — Z (S) $3405
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Sep 24, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a) Suite A, B & C, 701 N. Dupont Blvd, Milford, DE 19963: On or about April 2, 2025, employees were exposed to struck by hazards when they worked under an aerial lift without any type of head protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238310)
More inspections in DE
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348154279.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.