Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: OVIEDO STUCCO, LLC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of OVIEDO STUCCO, LLC in 9558 BUFFALO RD., PALMETTO, FL 34221 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 348157504.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Oviedo Stucco, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Oviedo Stucco, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
OVIEDO STUCCO, LLC
Site address
9558 BUFFALO RD.
City
PALMETTO
State
FL
ZIP
34221
Mailing
8106 N GALL BLVD LOT 24, ZEPHYRHILLS, FL 33541
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
5
Ownership type
Private (A)

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2025
Abate by
Feb 5, 2026
Penalty
Initial $398 · Current $398
29 CFR  1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:   a)  On or about December  30, 2025, the employer failed to submit certification of corrective actions, for  Serious citation 2, item 1-c issued on July 17, 2025 with an abatement due date of September 03, 2025.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $398

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2025
Abate by
Feb 5, 2026
Penalty
Initial $398 · Current $398
29 CFR  1903.19(d)(1):The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  a)  On or about December  30, 2025, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective actions, for  Serious citation 2, item 1-a issued on July 17, 2025 with an abatement due date of September 03, 2025.  b) On or about December  30, 2025, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective actions, for  Serious citation 2, item 1-b issued on July 17, 2025 with an abatement due date of September 03, 2025.  c) On or about December  30, 2025, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective actions, for  Serious citation 2, item 2 issued on July 17, 2025 with an abatement due date of September 03, 2025.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $398

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
29 CFR  1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level was not protected from falling to that lower level.   a) On or about April 3, 2025, at worksite: The employer exposed employees to fall hazards of approximately 20 ft in that there was an employee applying stucco from the third level of a tube and coupler scaffold with the top and mid rails removed and the right side of the scaffold was missing guard rails.  b) On or about April 3, 2025, at worksite:  The employer exposed employees to fall hazards of approximately 13 ft 4 in in that there was an employee applying stucco from the second level of a tube and coupler scaffold with the sides of the scaffold not having guard rails.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $4965

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2025
Penalty
Initial $3,547 · Current $3,547
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(1):Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.  a) On or about April 3, 2025, at worksite: The employer exposed employees to fall hazards of approximately 10 ft in that there was an employee applying stucco while on the canopy of the building without the use of fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3547

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2025
Abate by
Sep 3, 2025
Penalty
Initial $398 · Current $398
29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1):The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:   a) On or about April 3, 2025, at worksite: The employer exposed employees to chemical exposure hazards in that the employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program to include ensuring that the employer has a chemical inventory list and SDS' available on site.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $398

1910.1200 E01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2025
Abate by
Sep 3, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer did not compile a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet.   a) On or about April 3, 2025, at worksite: The employer exposed employees to chemical exposure hazards in that the employer did not develop chemical inventory list for the chemicals they were using.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2025
Abate by
Sep 3, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use  a) On or about April 3, 2025, at worksite: The employer exposed employees to chemical exposure hazards in that employees were allowed to work with hazardous chemicals and the employer did not ensure that the SDS was available on site.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

1926.451 F03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2025
Abate by
Sep 3, 2025
Penalty
Initial $398 · Current $398
29 CFR  1926.451(f)(3):Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:  a) On or about April 3, 2025, at worksite: The employer exposed employees to fall hazards of approximately 20 ft in that they were working on a scaffold that was not inspected by a competent person before use.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $398

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 348157504.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.