Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GLOBAL SECURE SHIPPING, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GLOBAL SECURE SHIPPING, INC. in 122 PENNY ROAD, OLD TOWN, ME 04468 (NAICS 332439). OSHA activity number 348160847.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Global Secure Shipping, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Global Secure Shipping, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
122 PENNY ROAD
City
OLD TOWN
State
ME
ZIP
04468
Mailing
P.O. BOX 549, OLD TOWN, ME 04468
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332439
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

16 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.28 B01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2025
Penalty
Initial $6,620 · Current $3,310 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that was 4 feet or more above a lower level was protected from falling by a guardrail system, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system:  Weld Area - Each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that was approximately 11 feet above a lower level was not protected from falling.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3310
  • — Z (S) $6620

1910.28 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure each employee on a runway, or similar walkway, was protected from falling 4 feet or more to a lower level by a guardrail system:  Weld Area - Each employee on a runway with an unprotected side or edge that was approximately 7 feet above a lower level was not protected from falling.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.30 A03 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.30(a)(3)(i): The employer did not ensure that employees were trained in the nature of fall hazards in the work area and how to recognize them:  Facility - The employer did not provide training for each employee exposed to fall hazards up to 11 feet while working on top on containers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.179 J01 I

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,824 · Current $2,412 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(1)(i): Prior to initial use, all new and altered cranes were not inspected to ensure compliance with the provisions of 29 CFR 1910.179(j):  Prior to initial use, new cranes were not inspected in the following instances:  a) Harrington - Hoist S/N 055180, Crane S/N 240572T. 1/2-ton jib crane in Bay 6.  b) Harrington - Hoist S/N 040506, Crane S/N 211118T. 1/2-ton jib crane in Bay 5.  c) Gorbel - Hoist S/N 048475, Crane S/N 670624. 1-ton crane in Bay 4/5.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2412
  • — Z (S) $4824

1910.179 J02

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2): Frequent inspections on cranes were not conducted at intervals as defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii) of this section covering the criteria set forth in 1910.179(j)(2)(i) through 1910.179(j)(2)(vii):   Frequent inspections were not done in the following instances:  a) Somatex - Crane S/N 28309, 3-ton overhead crane in Bay 6/7.  b) Harrington - Hoist S/N 055180, Crane S/N 240572T. 1/2-ton jib crane in Bay 6.  c) Harrington - S/N 040506, Crane S/N 211118T. 1/2-ton jib crane in Bay 5.  d) Gorbel - Hoist S/N 048475, Crane S/N 670624. 1-ton crane in Bay 4/5.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.179 J03

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(3): Complete periodic inspections of the cranes were not performed at intervals as generally defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii)(b) of this section:  Periodic inspections of cranes were not performed in the following instances:  a) Somatex - S/N 28309, 3-ton overhead crane in Bay 6/7.  b) Harrington - Hoist S/N 055180, Crane S/N 240572T. 1/2-ton jib crane in Bay 6.  c) Harrington - Hoist S/N 040506, Crane S/N 211118T. 1/2-ton jib crane in Bay 5.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.184 D

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,824 · Current $2,412 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.184(d): Slings, fastenings, and attachments were not inspected for damage or defects by a competent person each day before being used:  Facility - The employer did not ensure all chain and synthetic slings were inspected each day prior to use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2412
  • — Z (S) $4824

1910.184 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.184(e)(1): Steel chain slings did not have a permanently affixed durable identification stating size, grade, rated capacity, and reach:  Weld Area - A steel chain sling did not have an identification tag stating size, grade, rated capacity, and reach.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.184 E03 I

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.184(e)(3)(i): A thorough periodic inspection of alloy steel chain slings were not made at least once every 12 months:  Facility - Alloy steel chain sling inspections were not made at least once every 12 months.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.184 I09 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.184(i)(9)(iii): Synthetic web sling(s) with snags, punctures, tears and/or cuts were not immediately removed from service:  Weld Area - A 6-foot nylon sling, S/N W003-09476-13, was found to have a tear/cut and was not removed from service.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.179 L01

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,824 · Current $2,412 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(l)(1): A preventive maintenance program based on the crane manufacturer's recommendations was not established:  The employer did not have a preventative maintenance program established for cranes at the facility in the following instances:  a) Somatex - Crane S/N 28309, 3-ton overhead crane in Bay 6/7.  b) Harrington - Hoist S/N 055180, Crane S/N 240572T. 1/2-ton jib crane in Bay 6.  c) Harrington - S/N 040506, Crane S/N 211118T, 1/2-ton jib crane in Bay 5.  d) Gorbel - Hoist S/N 048475, Crane S/N 670624, 1-ton crane in Bay 4/5.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2412
  • — Z (S) $4824

1910.179 J02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2)(iv): An inspection of crane hoist chains were not made at least once a month, with a certification record which included the date of the inspection, signature of the person who conducted the inspection and an identifier for the ropes which were inspected:  A hoist chain inspection and certification record were not conducted at least monthly in the following instances:  a) Harrington - Hoist S/N 055180, 1/2-ton jib crane in Bay 6.  b) Harrington - Hoist S/N 040506, 1/2-ton jib crane in Bay 5.  c) Gorbel - Hoist S/N 048475, 1-ton crane in Bay 4/5.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.179 M01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(m)(1): A thorough inspection on crane ropes were not made at least once a month, with a certification record which included the date of the inspection, signature of the person who conducted the inspection, and an identifier for the ropes which were inspected:  Facility - A thorough wire rope inspection and certification record was not conducted at least monthly on the Somatex 3-ton crane.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.179 N04 I

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(n)(4)(i): At the beginning of each operator's shift, the upper limit switch of each hoist was not tested:  Hoists at the facility did not have the upper limit switch tested daily prior to use in the following instances:  a) Somatex - S/N 28309, 3-ton overhead crane in Bay 6/7.  b) Harrington - Hoist S/N 055180, Crane S/N 240572T. 1/2-ton jib crane in Bay 6.  c) Harrington - S/N 040506, Crane S/N 211118T. 1/2-ton jib crane in Bay 5.  d) Gorbel - Hoist S/N 048475, Crane S/N 670624. 1-ton crane in Bay 4/5.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.179 B08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,824 · Current $2,412 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(b)(8): Employee(s) other than designated personnel were permitted to operate cranes:  Facility - Employees other than qualified personnel were permitted to operate cranes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2412
  • — Z (S) $4824

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2025
Abate by
Jul 29, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that a workplace hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification that identified the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:  Facility - The employer did not verify that a workplace hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification that met the requirements of the regulation
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348160847.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.