Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: NAVARRETE CONSTRUCTION

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of NAVARRETE CONSTRUCTION in 9118 MARSTON WAY LOT 26, MONTGOMERY, AL 36118 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 348167321.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Navarrete Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Navarrete Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
9118 MARSTON WAY LOT 26
City
MONTGOMERY
State
AL
ZIP
36118
Mailing
5204 SUGAR PINE DR,, MONTGOMERY, AL 36116
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2025
Abate by
May 28, 2025
Penalty
Initial $2,837 · Current $2,837
29 CFR  1926.451(b)(1)(i):Each platform unit (e.g., scaffold plank, fabricated plank, fabricated deck, or fabricated platform) was not installed so that the space between adjacent units and the space between the platform and the uprights were no more than 1 inch (2.5 cm) wide, except where the employer can demonstrate that a wider space is necessary.  a) 9118 Marston Way, Lot 26: On or about April 9, 2025, and times prior, employees were exposed to fall hazards in that their employer allowed employees to walk/work on a scaffold platform that was not fully decked exposing employees to falls of 13 feet, 4 inches to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2837

1926.451 G01 VI

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2025
Abate by
May 28, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(g)(1)(vi): Each employee performing overhand bricklaying operations from a supported scaffold was not protected from falling from all open sides and ends of the scaffold (except at the side next to the wall being laid) by the use of a personal fall arrest system or guardrail system (with minimum 200 pound top rail capacity).   a) 9118 Marston Way, Lot 26: On or about April 9, 2025,  and at times prior, employees were exposed to fall hazards in that their employer allowed employees to walk/work on a scaffold platform which was 13 feet, 4 inches to the lower level without fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 I02 I A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2025
Abate by
May 28, 2025
Penalty
Initial $2,128 · Current $2,128

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1926.1153(i)(2)(i)(A):The employer did not ensure that each employee covered by this section could demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the health hazards associated with exposure to respirable crystalline silica:  a) 9118 Marston Way, Lot 26: On or about April 9, 2025, and at times prior, the employer failed to provide employees required to dry cut bricks at the construction site with training on health hazards associated with respirable crystalline silica.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2128

1910.1200 H03 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2025
Abate by
May 28, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area:  a) 9118 Marston Way, Lot 26: On or about April 9, 2025, and at times prior, the employer failed to provide his employees required to dry cut bricks at the construction site with information on health hazards associated with respirable crystalline silica.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2025
Abate by
May 28, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1926.1153(c)(1):For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1:  a) 9118 Marston Way, Lot 26: On or about April 9, 2025, and at times prior, the employer allowed employees to dry cut bricks using a stationary masonry saw that was not equipped with integrated water delivery system and the employer did not require the employees to wear respirators. Dry cutting bricks generated dust exposing employees to respirable crystalline silica.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.1153 D02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2025
Abate by
May 28, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1926.1153(d)(2)(i):The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section:  a) 9118 Marston Way, Lot 26: On or about April 9, 2025, and at times prior, the employer failed to assess the exposure of one employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with the standard or follow the methods listed in Table 1, while the employee was dry cutting bricks using a stationary masonry saw.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.1153 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2025
Abate by
May 28, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1926.1153(g)(1):The employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan:  a) 9118 Marston Way, Lot 26: On or about April 9, 2025, and at times prior, the employer failed to establish and implement a written exposure control plan for his employees involved in dry cutting bricks using a stationary masonry saw that generated dust exposing employees to respirable crystalline silica.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View Navarrete Construction's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348167321.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.