Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: EDDIE PEREZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EDDIE PEREZ in 13849 MADERO AVE, HORIZON CITY, TX 79928 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 348183435.

Watch Eddie Perez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Eddie Perez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
EDDIE PEREZ
Site address
13849 MADERO AVE
City
HORIZON CITY
State
TX
ZIP
79928
Mailing
241 SYLVIA RD SPC B, CHAPARRAL, NM 88081
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 4 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $398.00 · Current $398.00
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  a) On or about July 28, 2025, the employer did not submit documentation and Certification of Corrective Action for citation 1 item 1 issued on May 29, 2025, with an abatement due date of June 10, 2025.  b) On or about July 28, 2025, the employer did not submit documentation and Certification of Corrective Action for citation 1 item 2 issued on May 29, 2025, with an abatement due date of June 10, 2025.  c) On or about July 28, 2025, the employer did not submit documentation and Certification of Corrective Action for citation 1 item 3 issued on May 29, 2025, with an abatement due date of June 10, 2025.  d) On or about July 28, 2025, the employer did not submit documentation and Certification of Corrective Action for citation 1 item 4 issued on May 29, 2025, with an abatement due date of June 10, 2025.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $398

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4256.00 · Current $4256.00
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  a) On or about April 16, 2025, on the south side of the jobsite, an employee utilized a pneumatic nail gun without adequate eye protection while framing a residential home.  b) On or about April 16, 2025, on the south side of the jobsite, an employee utilized a handheld power saw without adequate eye protection while framing a residential home.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4256

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4256.00 · Current $4256.00
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system:  On or about April 16, 2025, on the south side of the jobsite, an employee engaged in residential construction was not protected by a fall protection system while framing a home.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4256

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4256.00 · Current $4256.00
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  On or about April 16, 2025, on the south side of the jobsite, an employee engaged in residential construction did not receive fall protection training prior to framing a home.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4256

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4256.00 · Current $4256.00
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  On or about April 16, 2025, on the south side of the jobsite, an employee utilized a ladder where the side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing while framing a residential home.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4256

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348183435.