CYPRESS, TX —
OSHA Inspection: SKEETER'S AUTO SERVICE
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SKEETER'S AUTO SERVICE in 12133 OLD HUFFMEISTER ROAD, CYPRESS, TX 77429 (NAICS 811111). OSHA activity number 348188996.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SKEETER'S AUTO SERVICE
- Site address
- 12133 OLD HUFFMEISTER ROAD
- City
- CYPRESS
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77429
- Mailing
- 12133 OLD HUFFMEISTER ROAD, CYPRESS, TX 77429
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811111
- Employees
- 19
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.106 E06 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $6620.00 · Current $3972.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(6)(ii): Category 2 flammable liquids with a flashpoint below 100 �F (37.8 �C) were dispensed into containers without the nozzle and container electrically interconnected. On or about April 17, 2025 and at times prior, in the back shop, employees were dispensing flammable materials from a Brake Clean Drum that was ungrounded.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3972
- — Z (S) $6620
1910.305 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3783.00 · Current $2270.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed. On or about April 17, 2025 and at times prior, in the main Auto Shop's eastern wall, a breaker box that employees routinely use to energize the Auto Shop had three unused openings in the breaker panel.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2269.8
- — Z (S) $3783
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4824.00 · Current $2894.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program that included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii). On or about April 11, 2025, and at times prior, in the Auto Shop, employees used hazardous materials without a written hazardous communication plan in place.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2894.4
- — Z (S) $4824
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area. On or about April 11, 2025, and at times prior, in the Auto Shop, employees used hazardous materials without a written hazardous communication plan in place.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 F06 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3783.00 · Current $2270.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical. On or about April 17, 2025 and at times prior, in the Auto Shop, employees were using unlabeled containers to hold chemicals, without any form of label or markings as to the chemicals identity.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2269.8
- — Z (S) $3783
1910.37 B03
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(3): Each exit door was not free of decorations or signs that obscured the visibility of the exit route door. On or about April 17, 2025 and at times prior, within the Auto Shop, an exit door leading out did not have an exit sign posted over it.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811111)
SHERIDAN, CO—2026-07-15
JOHN'S COLLISION REPAIR, INC.
MANASSAS, VA—2026-07-15
VAFMC LLC
NORFOLK, VA—2026-07-15
CITY OF NORFOLK DEPT OF GENERAL SERVICES DIVISION OF FLEET MANAGEMENT
ENOLA, PA—2026-07-15
ENOLA AUTO SALES
LYNCHBURG, TN—2026-07-14
MOORE COUNTY SCHOOLS - BUS GARAGE
More inspections in TX
WICHITA FALLS, TX—2026-07-16
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
SAN MARCOS, TX—2026-07-16
CASA MECHANICAL SERVICES, LTD.
CLARKSVILLE, TX—2026-07-15
SEQUOIAS TREE EXPERT LLC
EL PASO, TX—2026-07-15
SURE STEEL
CORPUS CHRISTI, TX—2026-07-15
NORTH STAR ENERGY SOLUTIONS LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348188996.