OSHA Inspection: ISAIAS NAVA TEYUCO

Issued

Apr 29, 2025

Abate by

May 14, 2025

Penalty

Initial $3,547 · Current $3,547

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:  On or about April 22, 2025, employees were exposed to fall, ladder and overhead hazards, on a residential construction site in Carlock, Illinois. The employer did not have an effective safety and health program with specific work rules, competent person oversight, and employee training to govern employees' activities.

Issued

Apr 29, 2025

Abate by

May 8, 2025

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):  On or about April 22, 2025, employees were exposed to fall, ladder, and overhead hazards, on a residential construction site in Carlock, Illinois. The employer did not have a competent person conducting frequent and periodic safety inspections at the construction site.

Issued

Apr 29, 2025

Abate by

May 14, 2025

Penalty

Initial $2,837 · Current $2,837

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:  On or about April 22, 2025, employees were exposed to overhead hazards without head protection, on a residential construction site in Carlock, Illinois.  The employer did not provide employee safety training in order to provide the employees with the knowledge to recognize construction safety hazards, as well as the procedures to follow in order to minimize or eliminate those safety hazards.

Issued

Apr 29, 2025

Abate by

May 8, 2025

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, were not protected by protective helmets:  On or about April 22, 2025, employees were exposed to overhead hazards without head protection, on a residential construction site in Carlock, Illinois.

Issued

Apr 29, 2025

Abate by

May 8, 2025

Penalty

Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b):   On or about April 22, 2025, employees were exposed to fall hazards of 11'-0" and 11'-8", without fall protection from the house eave and garage eave, on a residential construction site in Carlock, Illinois.

Issued

Apr 29, 2025

Abate by

May 14, 2025

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  On or about April 22, 2025, employees were exposed to fall hazards of 11'-0" and 11'-8", without fall protection from the house eave and garage eave, on a residential construction site in Carlock, Illinois.   The employer did not provide construction safety training to employees, in order to provide them with the knowledge necessary to recognize the hazards of falling and the safety requirements associated with fall protection, as well as the proper work procedures to follow, in order to minimize and eliminate the fall hazards.

Issued

Apr 29, 2025

Abate by

May 8, 2025

Penalty

Initial $3,547 · Current $3,547

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17): The attachment point of the body harness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head:  On or about April 22, 2025, employees were exposed to fall hazards of 11'-8" from the garage, and the employees' attachment point to the body harness was located at the side and not in the center of the employees' back near shoulder level, on a residential construction site in Carlock, Illinois.

Issued

Apr 29, 2025

Abate by

May 8, 2025

Penalty

Initial $3,547 · Current $3,547

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:   On or about April 22, 2025, an employee was exposed to fall hazards of 8 feet from the second story roof to the first story roof and 18 feet from the second story roof to ground level, while accessing and exiting the roof via an extension ladder that only extended 1.5 feet above the second story upper landing surface, on a residential construction site in Carlock, Illinois.

Issued

Apr 29, 2025

Abate by

May 8, 2025

Penalty

Initial $3,547 · Current $3,547

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6): Unsecured ladder(s) were used on surfaces that were not stable and level:   On or about April 22, 2025, employees were exposed to fall hazards of 11 feet, while using an extension ladder that was not used on a stable and level surface and was not secured to prevent accidental displacement, on a residential construction site in Carlock, Illinois.

Issued

Apr 29, 2025

Abate by

May 8, 2025

Penalty

Initial $3,547 · Current $3,547

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(15): Ladders were not inspected by a competent person for visible defects on a periodic basis and after an occurrence that could affect their safe use:   On or about April 22, 2025, employees were exposed to fall hazards of 11 feet, while using an extension ladder that had a broken shoe on one side, which made the ladder unstable, on a residential construction site in Carlock, Illinois.   The employer did not have a competent person inspect the ladders used at the site for visible defects that could affect their safe use.

Issued

Apr 29, 2025

Abate by

May 8, 2025

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired:     On or about April 22, 2025, employees were exposed to fall hazards of 11 feet, while using an extension ladder that had a broken shoe on one side, which made the ladder unstable, on a residential construction site in Carlock, Illinois.