SOUTH HADLEY, MA ·
OSHA Inspection: MANUEL LEYTON
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MANUEL LEYTON in 27 JUDD AVE, SOUTH HADLEY, MA 01075 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348203068.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MANUEL LEYTON
- Site address
- 27 JUDD AVE
- City
- SOUTH HADLEY
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 01075
- Mailing
- 1 ICE POND DR, FLORENCE, MA 01062
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2025
- Abate by
- Jul 29, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,682 · Current $4,682
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles: 27 Judd Ave., South Hadley, MA: On or about April 24, 2025, employees were using power tools, such as a Bostitch nail gun, and were not wearing safety glasses.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4682
1926.403 B01 I
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2025
- Abate by
- Jul 29, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,121 · Current $3,121
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(1)(i): Suitability of equipment for the intended purpose was not in compliance with the listing, labeling, and/or certification for that electrical device. 27 Judd Ave., South Hadley, MA: On or about April 24, 2025, employees were using a relocatable power tap, that had the directions "For Indoor Use only" molded into the rear of the device, to charge their tools outdoors.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $3121
1926.404 F06
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2025
- Abate by
- Jul 29, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures was neither permanent nor continuous: 27 Judd Ave., South Hadley, MA: On or about April 24, 2025, the extension cord in use to power battery chargers for battery powered tools had its grounding pin removed, therefore eliminating the continuous path to ground.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1926.502 D15
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2025
- Abate by
- Jul 29, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $5,462 · Current $5,462
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorages used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment were not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached: 27 Judd Ave., South Hadley, MA: On or about April 24, 2025, the lifeline used by an employee was wrapped around a chimney, consisting of stacked cinder blocks, and used as the anchor for his personal fall arrest equipment.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $5462
1926.502 D16 III
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2025
- Abate by
- Jul 29, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personnel Fall Arrest Systems were not rigged such that an employee would not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m), nor contact any lower level: 27 Judd Ave., South Hadley, MA: On or about April 24, 2025, an employee's personal fall arrest system was rigged so that he could stand on the ground without the break away portion being deployed, allowing him to free fall more than 6 feet and strike the ground before his protective system had an opportunity to fully deploy.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,682 · Current $4,682
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access: 27 Judd Ave., South Hadley, MA: On or about April 24, 2025, an employee was observed climbing up and down a fiberglass extension ladder that did not extend the required 3 feet past the upper landing surface, the roof.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4682
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 348203068.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.