Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: MANUEL LEYTON

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MANUEL LEYTON in 27 JUDD AVE, SOUTH HADLEY, MA 01075 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348203068.

Watch Manuel Leyton — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Manuel Leyton is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MANUEL LEYTON
Site address
27 JUDD AVE
City
SOUTH HADLEY
State
MA
ZIP
01075
Mailing
1 ICE POND DR, FLORENCE, MA 01062
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4682.00 · Current $4682.00
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1):  The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles:  27 Judd Ave., South Hadley, MA: On or about April 24, 2025, employees were using power tools, such as a Bostitch nail gun, and were not wearing safety glasses.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4682

1926.403 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3121.00 · Current $3121.00
29 CFR  1926.403(b)(1)(i): Suitability of equipment for the intended purpose was not in compliance with the listing, labeling, and/or certification for that electrical device.  27 Judd Ave., South Hadley, MA: On or about April 24, 2025, employees were using a relocatable power tap, that had the directions "For Indoor Use only" molded into the rear of the device, to charge their tools outdoors.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3121

1926.404 F06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.404(f)(6):  The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures was neither permanent nor continuous:  27 Judd Ave., South Hadley, MA: On or about April 24, 2025, the extension cord in use to power battery chargers for battery powered tools had its grounding pin removed, therefore eliminating the continuous path to ground.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 D15

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5462.00 · Current $5462.00
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(15):  Anchorages used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment were not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached:  27 Judd Ave., South Hadley, MA: On or about April 24, 2025, the lifeline used by an employee was wrapped around a chimney, consisting of stacked cinder blocks, and used as the anchor for his personal fall arrest equipment.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $5462

1926.502 D16 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(16)(iii):  Personnel Fall Arrest Systems were not rigged such that an employee would not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m), nor contact any lower level:  27 Judd Ave., South Hadley, MA: On or about April 24, 2025, an employee's personal fall arrest system was rigged so that he could stand on the ground without the break away portion being deployed, allowing him to free fall more than 6 feet and strike the ground before his protective system had an opportunity to fully deploy.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4682.00 · Current $4682.00
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1):  When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access:  27 Judd Ave., South Hadley, MA:  On or about April 24, 2025, an employee was observed climbing up and down a fiberglass extension ladder that did not extend the required 3 feet past the upper landing surface, the roof.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4682

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348203068.