LYNNFIELD, MA —
OSHA Inspection: ORTEGA FRAMING CONSTRUCTION INC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ORTEGA FRAMING CONSTRUCTION INC in 1 TUTTLE LANE, LYNNFIELD, MA 01940 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 348203084.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ORTEGA FRAMING CONSTRUCTION INC
- Site address
- 1 TUTTLE LANE
- City
- LYNNFIELD
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 01940
- Mailing
- 425 DIVISION STREET APT 3, FALL RIVER, MA 02721
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $4965.00 · Current $4965.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying objects while using a nail gun. Location: Job site; On or about 04/24/2025, employees were allowed to utilize pneumatic nail guns without proper eye/face protection to protect against potential flying objects.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $4965
- — I (S) $2482.5
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $4965.00 · Current $4965.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): An employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. Location: Job site; On or about 04/24/2025, the employer allowed employees to work from an improvised platform on the forks of their JCB Loadall rough terrain forklift that was 24-feet above the ground below and was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrails.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $4965
- — I (S) $2482.5
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $4965.00 · Current $4965.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b). Location: Job site; On or about 04/24/2025, employees were allowed to engage in framing activities of a new residential home without the use of fall protection from approximately 24-feet above the ground below without the use of fall protection, guardrails, safety net systems, or other alternative fall protection measures.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $4965
- — I (S) $2482.5
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.502 A02
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(a)(2): The employer did not provide and install all fall protection systems required by this subpart for employee(s) and did not comply with all other pertinent requirements of this subpart before employee(s) began the work that necessitates the fall protection. Location: Job site; On or around April 24, 2025, employees were permitted to conduct framing activities at a height of 24 feet or more above the ground without properly installed fall protection systems. Instead, employees were allowed to tie the lifeline directly to the roof's structural members and back onto itself.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.602 C01 VI
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $4965.00 · Current $4965.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(vi): Section 603(e) of American National Standard Institute, B56.1-1969 Safety Standards for Powered Industrial Trucks, as adopted by 29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(vi): When a truck was left unattended, load engaging means were not fully lowered, controls were not neutralized, power was not shut off, brakes were not set, and the key or connector plug was not removed. Location: Job site; On or around April 24, 2025, a JCB Loadall rough terrain forklift was left unattended with a suspended load consisting of a makeshift work platform. This platform was occupied by a framing contractor and was positioned 24 feet or more above the ground.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $4965
- — I (S) $2482.5
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.602 C01 VIII A
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(viii)(A): The industrial truck was not equipped with a safety platform/cage firmly secured to the lifting carriage and/or forks when used for lifting personnel. Location: Job site; On or about 04/24/2025, the employer allowed employees to be work from and be hoisted in an makeshift work platform 24-feet above the ground to the roof edge of a new residential construction to perform framing activities. The improvised platform was not a manufacturer approved work platform and was unsecured/unguarded.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
ENCINITAS, CA—2026-07-13
LOU RIDDLE CONSTRUCTION
MERIDIAN, ID—2026-07-10
IDAHO HOMES CONSTRUCTION LLC
KIMBERLY, WI—2026-07-10
ENRIQUE RESENDIC
METTER, GA—2026-07-10
M.A.P.C CONSTRUCTION, LLC
SLINGER, WI—2026-07-10
RAMIREZ HOME BUILDERS LLC
More inspections in MA
WORCESTER, MA—2026-07-10
QUINSIGAMOND COMMUNITY COLLEGE
FITCHBURG, MA—2026-07-10
KELLEY WOOD PRODUCTS, INC.
EVERETT, MA—2026-07-10
HORIZON RETAIL CONSTRUCTION INC
NORTON, MA—2026-07-09
DYNAMIC RESIDENTIAL ROOF MARKETING, LLC
NORTON, MA—2026-07-09
LM GENERAL CONSTRUCTION INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348203084.