Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: WANNER FRANCISCO LEMUS MALDONADO DBA WANNER FRANCISCO LEMUS MALDONADO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of WANNER FRANCISCO LEMUS MALDONADO DBA WANNER FRANCISCO LEMUS MALDONADO in 3845 N SPRINGFIELD AVENUE, CHICAGO, IL 60618 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348205386.

Watch Wanner Francisco Lemus Maldonado DBA Wanner Francisco Lemus Maldonado — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Wanner Francisco Lemus Maldonado DBA Wanner Francisco Lemus Maldonado is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3845 N SPRINGFIELD AVENUE
City
CHICAGO
State
IL
ZIP
60618
Mailing
1903 ASH DR APT 3, ELGIN, IL 60120
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2025
Penalty
Initial $2,837 · Current $2,837
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors or potentially injurious light radiation.  a) On April 24, 2025,  at the above addressed jobsite, employees were exposed to eye injury while operating pneumatic roofing nail guns without eye protection during roof shingles installation.   No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2837

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   a)  On April 24, 2025,  at the above addressed jobsite, employees engaged in roofing activity were not protected from fall hazards while working from a pitched roof with the ground to eave height of approximately 23.4 feet.   b)  On April 24, 2025,  at the above addressed jobsite, employees engaged in roofing activity were not protected from fall hazards while working from a pitched roof with the ground to eave height of approximately 13.3 feet.   No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.502 D06 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(6)(i): Snaphooks were connected directly to webbing, rope or wire rope:  a) On April 24, 2025,  at the above addressed jobsite, snaphooks were connected to the nylon webbing of body harnesses used for fall protection on pitched roof surfaces.  No abatement certification or documentation required for this violation.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.502 D17

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(17):The attachment point of the body harness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head:  a)  On April 24, 2025,  at the above addressed jobsite, the front nylon straps of body harnesses were used as attachment points for fall protection on pitched roof surfaces.  No abatement certification or documentation required for this violation.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2025
Penalty
Initial $3,547 · Current $3,547
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:  a) On April 24, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, an extension ladder used by employees to access and egress the roof did not have its side rails extended at least 3 feet above the roof eave.  No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3547

1926.1053 B22

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2025
Penalty
Initial $3,547 · Current $3,547
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(22): Employees using ladders were carrying objects or loads that could cause the employee to lose balance and fall:  a) On April 24, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee was exposed to fall hazards while carrying material up an extension ladder.  No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3547

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348205386.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.