OSHA Inspection: GIOVANNI JIENER RIVERA NAVAS

Issued

May 30, 2025

Abate by

Jun 16, 2025

Penalty

Initial $3,547 · Current $3,547

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:    On or about May 1, 2025, employees were exposed to struck-by and fall hazards on a construction site in Peoria, Illinois, and the employer did not have an effective safety and health program with specific work rules, competent person oversight, and employee training to govern employees' activities.

Issued

May 30, 2025

Abate by

Jun 16, 2025

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):    On or about May 1, 2025, employees were exposed to a fall and struck-by hazard on a construction site in Peoria, Illinois, and the employer did not ensure a competent person inspected the job site for unsafe activity and took necessary steps to eliminate or control the hazards.

Issued

May 30, 2025

Penalty

Initial $2,837 · Current $2,837

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:  On or about May 1, 2025, an employee was exposed to the hazard of being struck in the head by falling materials and tools, on a construction site in Peoria, Illinois, and was not required to wear a hard hat while working underneath employees performing construction activities.

Issued

May 30, 2025

Penalty

Initial $3,547 · Current $3,547

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:    On or about May 1, 2025, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while using a pneumatic nail gun, on a construction site in Peoria, Illinois, and the employer did not ensure the use of eye protection.

Issued

May 30, 2025

Abate by

Jun 16, 2025

Penalty

Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system:    On or about May 1, 2025, employees were exposed to a fall hazard on a construction site in Peoria, Illinois, and the employer did not ensure an adequate fall protection system was being used.

Issued

May 30, 2025

Abate by

Jun 16, 2025

Penalty

Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage points used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment were not  independent of any anchorage point being used to support or suspend platforms and capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee:  On or about May 1, 2025, employees were exposed to a fall hazard on a construction site in Peoria, Illinois, when anchoring from the same anchor point.  The employer did not ensure each anchorage points used were capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds per employee.

Issued

May 30, 2025

Abate by

Jun 16, 2025

Penalty

Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level:  On or about May 1, 2025, employees were exposed to a fall hazard on a construction site in Peoria, Illinois, and adequate fall protection was not being used because the lanyard was not rigged where the employee could not free fall more than 6 feet or contact the lower level.