Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: NESTOR UZHCA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of NESTOR UZHCA in 7012 DUNCAN RIDGE COURT, HARRISON, OH 45030 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 348219775.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Nestor Uzhca — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Nestor Uzhca is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
NESTOR UZHCA
Site address
7012 DUNCAN RIDGE COURT
City
HARRISON
State
OH
ZIP
45030
Mailing
5245 RUCKS RD, DAYTON, OH 45417
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 16, 2025
Abate by
Aug 20, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,256 · Current $4,256
29 CFR 1926.451(g) Fall Protection. (1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level shall be protected from falling to that lower level. Paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (vii) of this section establish the types of fall protection to be provided to the employees on each type of scaffold. Paragraph (g)(2) of this section addresses fall protection for scaffold erectors and dismantlers. Note to paragraph (g)(1): The fall protection requirements for employees installing suspension scaffold support systems on floors, roofs, and other elevated surfaces are set forth in subpart M of this part.    a) On May 1, 2025, the employer failed to ensure that employees used an adequate fall protection system while performing siding work on a newly constructed residential structure. As a result, two employees were exposed to a fall hazard of 18' while installing siding without a fall protection system while working on an Alum-A-Pole Corporation brand pump-jack scaffolding system.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4256

1926.451 G04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 16, 2025
Abate by
Aug 20, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(g) Fall Protection. (4)(i):Guardrail systems shall be installed along all open sides and ends of platforms. Guardrail systems shall be installed before the scaffold is released for use by employees other than erection/dismantling crews.  a) On May 1, 2025, the employer failed to ensure that employees used a guardrail system on the ends of a scaffold while performing siding work on a newly constructed residential structure. As a result, three employees were exposed to a fall hazard greater than 18' while installing siding without guardrails while working on an Alum-A-Pole Corporation brand pump-jack scaffolding system.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 16, 2025
Abate by
Aug 20, 2025
Penalty
Initial $5,958 · Current $5,958
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a) On May 1, 2025, the employer failed to ensure that employees used a fall protection system while performing siding work on a residential structure. As a result, one employee, performing siding work on a residential structure at a height of 12'4'' without using a fall protection system, was exposed to a fall hazard. The roof pitch was 4/12.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $5958

View Nestor Uzhca's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348219775.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.