OSHA Inspection: BUILD WITH MD

Issued

Jun 27, 2025

Penalty

Initial $4,965 · Current $3,000 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.452(w)(5):Mobile scaffolds were not stabilized to prevent tipping during movement  On or about May 2, 2025, during the installation of framing material (roof trusses) at a job site located at 83 E. Main St, Salineville Ohio 43945; the employer did not ensure employees working on a baker scaffold to gain access to an elevated working surface stabilized the baker scaffold prior to moving it to prevent it from tipping over.

Issued

Jun 27, 2025

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.452(w)(6)(i): Employee(s) were allowed to ride on scaffolds when the surface on which the scaffold was moved was not within 3 degrees of level, and/or not free of pits, holes, and obstructions:     On or about May 2, 2025, during the installation of framing material (roof trusses) at a job site located at 83 E. Main ST, Salineville Ohio 43945; the employer allowed employees working on a baker scaffold to gain access to elevated working surface to move the scaffold while standing on the working platform approximately 8 to 9 feet above the ground. The surface that the mobile scaffold was moved on was not clear of debris, tools, and material to be installed, then when the scaffold struck the debris the scaffold tipped over.

Issued

Jun 27, 2025

Penalty

Initial $4,965 · Current $3,000 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.502(d)(15):Anchorages used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment shall be independent of any anchorage being used to support or suspend platforms and capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached, or shall be designed, installed, and used as follows:  On or about May 2, 2025, during the installation of framing material (roof trusses) at a job site located at 83 E. Main ST, Salineville Ohio 43945; the employer did not ensure employees working on mobile scaffolds (Baker Scaffold) were protected from a fall of approximately 8 to 9 feet by utilizing a fall protection system that had adequate anchorage.

Issued

Jun 27, 2025

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

1926.503(c) Retraining. When the employer has reason to believe that any affected employee who has already been trained does not have the understanding and skill required by paragraph (a) of this section, the employer shall retrain each such employee. Circumstances where retraining is required include, but are not limited to, situations where:  29 CFR  1926.503(c)(3): Inadequacies in an affected employee's knowledge or use of fall protection systems or equipment indicate that the employee has not retained the requisite understanding or skill.   On or about May 2, 2025, during the installation of framing material (roof trusses) at a job site located at 83 E. Main ST, Salineville Ohio 43945; the employer did not ensure employees working from a mobile scaffold (baker scaffold) were protected from a fall of approximately 8 to 9 feet by utilizing an adequately anchored fall protection system.