Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MILCON CONTRACTING OF CAPE COD INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MILCON CONTRACTING OF CAPE COD INC. in 20 SCHOOL HOUSE ROAD, PINE ISLAND, NY 10969 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348231192.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Milcon Contracting of Cape COD INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Milcon Contracting of Cape COD INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
20 SCHOOL HOUSE ROAD
City
PINE ISLAND
State
NY
ZIP
10969
Mailing
20 CEDAR ST, WEST BARNSTABLE, MA 02668
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
1
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 8, 2025
Abate by
Oct 21, 2025
Penalty
Initial $11,585 · Current $11,585
29 CFR  1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):   (a) Worksite - On or about April 17, 2025, a worker was operating a JLG telehandler model #10054 to collet roofing material removed from the a school roof. The employer did not ensure that the worker completed powered industrial truck training and evaluation prior to use.
Recent events (2)
  • — C (S) $11585
  • — Z (S) $11585

1926.502 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Oct 8, 2025
Abate by
Oct 21, 2025
Penalty
Initial $11,585 · Current $11,585
29 CFR  1926.502(b)(2): Midrails, screens, mesh, intermediate vertical members, or equivalent intermediate structure members were not installed between the top edge of the guardrail system and the walking/working surface when there was no wall or parapet wall at least 21 inches (53 cm) high:   (a) Worksite, roof: On or about April 17, 2025, employees were working along the edge of a flat roof of a school building approximately 40-feet above the ground. The  guardrail system was constructed from pieces of wood and was not capable of withstanding at least 200 pounds of force exposing employee to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — C (S) $11585
  • — Z (S) $11585

1926.503 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Oct 8, 2025
Abate by
Oct 21, 2025
Penalty
Initial $8,276 · Current $8,276
29 CFR  1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer:    (a) Worksite - On or about April 15, 2025, employees were working on a flat roof of a school building approximately 14-feet above the lower roof. The employer did not verify employees fall protection training with a written certification.
Recent events (2)
  • — C (S) $8276
  • — Z (S) $8276

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348231192.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.