SPRINGFIELD, IL —
OSHA Inspection: STOCKTON CONSTRUCTION LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of STOCKTON CONSTRUCTION LLC in 2601 DICKENS DRIVE, SPRINGFIELD, IL 62711 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348248196.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- STOCKTON CONSTRUCTION LLC
- Site address
- 2601 DICKENS DRIVE
- City
- SPRINGFIELD
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62711
- Mailing
- 102 HERITAGE POINT, NEW BERLIN, IL 62670
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3547.00 · Current $2483.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part: On or about May 15, 2025, employees were exposed to fall hazards and eye injuries, on a residential construction site in Springfield, Illinois. The employer did not have an effective safety and health program with specific work rules, competent person oversight, and employee training to govern employees' activities.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2482.9
- — Z (S) $3547
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s): On or about May 15, 2025, employees were exposed to fall hazards and eye injuries, on a residential construction site in Springfield, Illinois. The employer did not have a competent person conducting frequent and periodic safety inspections at the construction site.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3547.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: On or about May 15, 2025, an employee was exposed to eye injuries without eye protection, while using a pneumatic gun, on a residential construction site in Springfield, Illinois. The employer did not provide employee safety training in order to provide the employee with the knowledge to recognize construction safety hazards, as well as the procedures to follow in order to minimize or eliminate those safety hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $3547
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles: On or about May 15, 2025, an employee was exposed to eye injuries without eye protection, while using a pneumatic gun, on a residential construction site in Springfield, Illinois.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4965.00 · Current $3476.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b): On or about May 15, 2025, employees were exposed to fall hazards greater than 10 feet without fall protection, on a residential construction site in Springfield, Illinois.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3475.5
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: On or about May 15, 2025, employees were exposed to fall hazards greater than 10 feet without fall protection, on a residential construction site in Springfield, Illinois. The employer did not provide construction safety training to employees, in order to provide them with the knowledge necessary to recognize the hazards of falling and the safety requirements associated with fall protection, as well as the proper work procedures to follow, in order to minimize and eliminate the fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3547.00 · Current $2483.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: On or about May 15, 2025, employees were exposed to fall hazards of 9.5 feet, while accessing and exiting the roof via an extension ladder that did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface of the roof, on a residential construction site in Springfield, Illinois.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2482.6
- — Z (S) $3547
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize hazards related to ladders and stairways: On or about May 15, 2025, employees were exposed to fall hazards of 9.5 feet, while accessing and exiting the roof via an extension ladder that did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface of the roof, on a residential construction site in Springfield, Illinois. The employer did not provide construction safety training to employees, in order to provide them with the knowledge necessary to recognize the hazards related to ladders, as well as the proper work procedures to follow, in order to minimize and eliminate these hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
SIOUX FALLS, SD—2026-07-13
H & R ROOFING OF SOUTH DAKOTA, INC.
HENDERSON, NV—2026-07-13
INTEGRITY ROOFING LLC
CORTLANDT MANOR, NY—2026-07-13
LG BUILDERS INC.
CAMDEN, OH—2026-07-13
ALBERTO MORALES
BLOOMINGTON, IL—2026-07-13
UNKNOWN CONTRACTOR
More inspections in IL
BLOOMINGTON, IL—2026-07-13
UNKNOWN CONTRACTOR
GRANITE CITY, IL—2026-07-13
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
DECATUR, IL—2026-07-10
TILLAMOOK ILLINOIS, LLC
NEW LENOX, IL—2026-07-10
A.D GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LLC
LOCKPORT, IL—2026-07-09
ROBERTO GOMEZ DBA ROBERTO GOMEZ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348248196.