Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: Q TECH, LLC

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of Q TECH, LLC in 800 CENTRAL STREET, NORTH SMITHFIELD, RI 02896 (NAICS 331492). OSHA activity number 348255944.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Q Tech, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Q Tech, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
Q TECH, LLC
Site address
800 CENTRAL STREET
City
NORTH SMITHFIELD
State
RI
ZIP
02896
Mailing
800 CENTRAL STREET, NORTH SMITHFIELD, RI 02896
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
331492
Employees
26
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.120 Q03 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2025
Penalty
Initial $11,585 · Current $8,110 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0790

29 CFR 1910.120(q)(3)(iii): Based on the hazardous substances and/or conditions present, the individual in charge of the ICS did not implement appropriate emergency operations and did not ensure that the personal protective equipment worn was appropriate for the hazards encountered.  a) Solutions Area: On or about May 14, 2025, the employer did not ensure that the individual in charge of the incident command system (ICS) properly implemented appropriate emergency operations to ensure that the personal protective equipment worn was appropriate for the hazards encountered, which as a 1% silver cyanide solution spill.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $8109.5
  • — Z (S) $11585

1910.120 Q03 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0790

29 CFR 1910.120(q)(3)(iv): Employees engaged in emergency response and exposed to hazardous substances presenting an inhalation hazard or potential inhalation hazard, did not wear positive-pressure self-contained breathing apparatus until such time that the individual in charge of the incident command system determined through the use of air monitoring that a decreased level of respiratory protection would not result in hazardous exposures to employees.  a) Solutions Area: On or about May 14, 2025, the employer did not ensure that employees engaged in an emergency response where they were exposed to hazardous substances, such as 1% silver cyanide solution, presenting an inhalation hazard or potential inhalation hazard, wore a positive-pressure self-contained breathing apparatus until such time that the individual in charge of the incident command system determined through the use of air monitoring that a decreased level of respiratory protection would not result in hazardous exposures to employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.120 Q06 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0790

29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(iii): Employees who participated as hazardous materials technicians, or were expected to participate as hazardous materials technicians, had not received at least 24 hours of training equal to the first responder operations level, and in addition have competency in the areas outlined in 29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(iii)(A) through (q)(6)(iii)(I) and/or the employer did not so certify.    a) Solutions Area: On or about May 14, 2025, the employer did not ensure that employees who participated as hazardous materials technicians, or were expected to participate as hazardous materials technicians, had received at least 24 hours of training equal to the first responder operations level, and in addition to having competency in the areas outlined in 29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(iii)(A) through (q)(6)(iii)(I) and/or the employer did not so certify. Specifically the training not covered included, but is not limited to these topics: 1910.120(q)(6)(iii) (D) Knowledge on how to select and use proper specialized chemical personal protective equipment provided to the hazardous materials technician. 1910.120(q)(6)(iii)(F) The ability to be able to perform advance control, containment, and/or confinement operations within the capabilities of the resources and personal protective equipment available with the unit.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.120 Q10

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0790

29 CFR 1910.120(q)(10): Chemical protective clothing and equipment to be used by organized and designated HAZMAT team members, or to be used by hazardous materials specialists, did not meet the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.120(g)(3) through (g)(5).  a) Solutions Area: On or about May 14, 2025, the employer did not ensure that the chemical protective clothing and equipment to be used by organized and designated HAZMAT team members, or to be used by hazardous materials specialists, met the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.120(g)(3) through (g)(5) in that:  1) Positive pressure Self Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) or Supplied Air Respirators (SAR) not used in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.120(g)(3)(iii), 2) Totally Encapsulating Chemical Protective Suits equivalent to Level A not used in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.120(g)(3)(iv).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.151 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2025
Abate by
Dec 24, 2025
Penalty
Initial $7,035 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(a): Medical personnel were not readily available for advice and consultation on matters of plant health.  a) Solutions Area: On or about May 14, 2025, the employer did not ensure that emergency medical services, including those equipped with effective cyanide antidotes, were readily available in the event of an acute cyanide overexposure in the workplace. The employer processes silver cyanide solutions.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $7035

1910.178 M02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2025
Penalty
Initial $11,585 · Current $8,110 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(m)(2): Employee(s) stood under or passed under the elevated portion of a powered industrial truck(s).  (a) Solutions Area: On or about May 14, 2025, the employer allowed an employee to work under the elevated portion of a powered industrial truck while attempting to contain a chemical leak.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $8109.5
  • — Z (S) $11585

1910.178 M05 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(m)(5)(iii): Powered industrial truck(s), with the operator dismounted and within 25 feet of the truck still in his view, did not have his load fully lowered.   (a) Solutions Area: On or about May 14, 2025, the employer allowed an employee to dismount the powered industrial truck without fully lowering his load.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348255944.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.