Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: EMD, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of EMD, INC. in 1855 EAST MAIN ST., COLUMBUS, OH 43205 (NAICS 811310). OSHA activity number 348256728.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch EMD, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for EMD, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
EMD, INC.
Site address
1855 EAST MAIN ST.
City
COLUMBUS
State
OH
ZIP
43205
Mailing
1611 COLLEGE DRIVE, P.O. BOX 458, MOUNT CARMEL, IL 62863
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811310
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1910.147 D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 20, 2025
Abate by
Sep 2, 2025
Penalty
Initial $6,621 · Current $6,621
29 CFR  1910.147(d):Application of control. The established procedures for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) shall cover the following elements and actions and shall be done in accordance with the (d)(1) through (d)(6):  On or about May 13, 2025, an employee was exposed to the moving blades of an airlock inside the load out of a silo while performing maintenance and servicing activities such as but not limited removing material that was blocking the load out. The employer failed to implement energy control application steps as the machine was not shut down or turned off to perform the servicing work [per the 1910.147 (d)(2) requirements]. As a result, the remaining applicable energy control elements, involving machine isolation [(d)(3)], LOTO device application [(d)(4)], dissipation of residual energy [(d)(5)], and verification of isolation [(d)(6)], were not implemented to protect employees from machine servicing hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $6621

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348256728.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.