GARLAND, TX —
OSHA Inspection: ARTEMIO MENDEZ-RAMIREZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ARTEMIO MENDEZ-RAMIREZ in 7305 FARMHOUSE DRIVE, GARLAND, TX 75043 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348265190.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ARTEMIO MENDEZ-RAMIREZ
- Site address
- 7305 FARMHOUSE DRIVE
- City
- GARLAND
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 75043
- Mailing
- 9408 PINEHAVEN DRIVE, DALLAS, TX 75227
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2025
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,256 · Current $4,256
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: (a) On or about June 26, 2025, employees doing roof work on a two stories single family residential house and using nail guns without the use of safety glasses.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4256
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2025
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: On or about May 16, 2025, employees doing roof work on a single-family house of more than 6-feet did not have a personal fall arrest system, guardrail system or safety net: (a) Fall hazard of approximately 19 feet
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: (a) On or about May 16, 2025, Employees were accessing a two story house and did not have a ladders that extended 3 feet about the upper level.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4965
More inspections at Artemio Mendez-Ramirez
View Artemio Mendez-Ramirez's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348265190.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.