WALES, WI —
OSHA Inspection: GRANITE DIRECT, INC.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of GRANITE DIRECT, INC. in 210 N WALES ROAD, WALES, WI 53183 (NAICS 423320). OSHA activity number 348266115.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GRANITE DIRECT, INC.
- Site address
- 210 N WALES ROAD
- City
- WALES
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53183
- Mailing
- PO BOX 99, WALES, WI 53183
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 423320
- Employees
- 12
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Mar 6, 2026
- Abate by
- Mar 20, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $398 · Current $398
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1):The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. (a) Granite Direct, Inc. failed to document abatement within 10 calendar days after the abatement date that each of the following cited violations had been corrected: Citation 1, Item 1a, a serious violation of 29 CFR 1910.1053(d)(3)(i) with an abatement date of January 5, 2026. Citation 1, Item 1b, a serious violation of 29 CFR 1910.1053(f)(2)(i) with an abatement date of January 5, 2026. Citation 1, Item 1c, a serious violation of 29 CFR 1910.1053(j)(1) with an abatement date of January 5, 2026. Citation 1, Item 2a , a serious violation of 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1) with an abatement date of January 5, 2026. Citation 1, Item 2b, a serious violation of 29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1) with an abatement date of January 5, 2026. Citation 1, Item 2c, a serious violation of 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) with an abatement date of January 5, 2026. Citation 2, Item 1 , an other-than-serious violation of 29 CFR 1904.32(a)(2) with an abatement date of January 5, 2026. Citation 2, Item 2 , an other-than-serious violation of 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i) with an abatement date of January 5, 2026. Citation 2, Item 3 , an other-than-serious violation of 29 CFR 1910.178(a)(5) with an abatement date of January 5, 2026. Citation 2, Item 4, an other-than-serious violation of 29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii) with an abatement date of January 5, 2026. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1), abatement certification and documentation of abatement is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $398
1910.1053 D03 I
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2025
- Abate by
- Jan 5, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $3,547
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(d)(3)(i): The employer did not perform initial monitoring to assess the 8-hour TWA exposure for each employee on the basis of one or more personal breathing zone air samples that reflect the exposures of employees on each shift, for each job classification, in each work area: (a) On or about May 22, 2025, the employer did not perform initial monitoring to assess the 8-hour TWA exposure for respirable crystalline silica for each employee working in fabrication.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3547
1910.1053 F02 I
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2025
- Abate by
- Jan 5, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(f)(2)(i): The employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan: (a) On or about May 22, 2025, the employer did not establish a written exposure control plan to address employee silica exposures.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1053 J01
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2025
- Abate by
- Jan 5, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(j)(1): The employer did not ensure that each employee was trained in accordance with the provisions of HCS and paragraph (j)(3) of this section: (a) On or about May 22, 2025, the employer did not ensure that each employee was trained in accordance with the provisions of HCS and paragraph (j)(3) of this section on the hazards of crystalline silica.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2025
- Abate by
- Jan 5, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $3,547
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (a) On or about May 22, 2025, the employer did not develop a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met for employees working in fabrication and exposed to hazardous materials, including respirable crystalline silica.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3547
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2025
- Abate by
- Jan 5, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use. (a) On or about May 22, 2025, the employer did not have safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use, including granite and quartz slabs.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2025
- Abate by
- Jan 5, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area. (a) On or about May 22, 2025, fabrication employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:, including respirable crystalline silica.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1904.32 A02
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2025
- Abate by
- Jan 5, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.32(a)(2): 29 CFR 1904.32(a)(2): At the end of each calendar year, an annual summary was not created for injuries and illnesses recorded on the OSHA 300 Log: (a) On or about May 22, 2025, the employer did not create an annual summary for injuries and illnesses recorded on the OSHA 300 log for calendar year 2024.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 C02 I
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2025
- Abate by
- Jan 5, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible: (a) On or about May 22, 2025, the employer did not ensure that each employee was provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.178 A05
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2025
- Abate by
- Jan 5, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(5): The powered industrial truck was equipped with front-end attachments other than factory installed attachments, however the employer did not request that the truck be marked to identify the attachments and show the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation with load laterally centered: (a) On or about May 22, 2025, the employer did not ensure that the Toyota forklift was marked to identify the attachment and show the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation with load laterally centered.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.178 L01 II
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2025
- Abate by
- Jan 5, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck (a) On or about May 22, 2025, the employer did not ensure that each forklift operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Granite Direct, INC.
View Granite Direct, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 423320)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348266115.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.