NEW CITY, NY —
OSHA Inspection: LUIS DOMINGUEZ HUMALA
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of LUIS DOMINGUEZ HUMALA in 2 HALLMARK DR, NEW CITY, NY 10956 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348266610.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LUIS DOMINGUEZ HUMALA
- Site address
- 2 HALLMARK DR
- City
- NEW CITY
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 10956
- Mailing
- 42 BADGER STREET, NEW CITY, NY 10956
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jun 2, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,256 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):The employer did not ensure employees used eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: On or about May 23nd, 2025 Location: 2 Hallmark Dr, New City, NY 10956 a) Employees were exposed to eye injuries while installing roof shingles using pneumatic nail guns without eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $4256
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jun 2, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $3,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b) On or about May 23nd, 2025 Location: 2 Hallmark Dr, New City, NY 10956 a) Employees were exposed to falls of approximately 12 feet while working on 6:12 roof pitch installing roof shingles without personal fall arrest or other fall protection system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3500
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.503 A02
- Issued
- Jun 2, 2025
- Abate by
- Jun 20, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2):The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii) On or about May 23nd, 2025 Location: 2 Hallmark Dr, New City, NY 10956 a) Employees did not have fall protection training. Employees were exposed to a fall of approximately 12 ft while working at the 6:12 pitch roof without a fall protection system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348266610.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.