Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LEONARDO GARCIA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LEONARDO GARCIA in 3618 LAVISTA ROAD, LOT 1, DECATUR, GA 30033 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 348268822.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Leonardo Garcia — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Leonardo Garcia is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LEONARDO GARCIA
Site address
3618 LAVISTA ROAD, LOT 1
City
DECATUR
State
GA
ZIP
30033
Mailing
2095 MITCHELL RD APT B, NORCROSS, GA 30071
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2025
Penalty
Initial $1,809 · Current $1,809
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  a) On or about May 27, 2025, the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards while operating pneumatic framing nail guns, in that protective eyewear was not provided to employees engaged in framing activities while operating these tools at 130 PSI.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1809

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2025
Penalty
Initial $3,015 · Current $3,015
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:    a) Portico: On or about May 27, 2025, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of approximately 15 feet to the lower level, in that a fall protection system was not provided to employees engaged in framing activities.  b) Second level: On or about May 27, 2025,  and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of approximately 18 feet to the lower level, in that a fall protection system was not provided to employees engaged in framing while working with an unprotected side or edge.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3015

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2025
Penalty
Initial $2,837 · Current $2,837
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  a) Second floor: On or about May 27, 2025, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of approximately 10 feet 5 inches to the lower level, in that the ladder provided did not have siderails which extended at least 3 feet past the landing surface and was not secured to allow for safe access.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2837

1926.403 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(1): Employer did not ensure that electrical equipment is free from recognized hazards that are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees:   a) On or about May 27, 2025, the employer failed to inspect all electrical extension cords used to provide power to electric tools which employees engaged in framing operations were using, in that the yellow extension cord powering the circular and reciprocating saws was damaged. An inspection of these cords was not performed prior to the shift as these cords were not repaired or removed from service.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.404 F06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, or enclosures was not permanent and continuous:  a) On or about May 27, 2025, the employer exposed employees to 120V electrical shock hazards while operating reciprocating and circular saws, impact drills, and battery chargers, in that the yellow extension cord was missing the grounding pin.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348268822.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.