SAN ANTONIO, TX —
OSHA Inspection: FELIX N. GONZALES
Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of FELIX N. GONZALES in 4950 BLUE RANCH, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78222 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348274382.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FELIX N. GONZALES
- Site address
- 4950 BLUE RANCH
- City
- SAN ANTONIO
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78222
- Mailing
- 3495 EICHMAN RD., POTEET, TX 78065
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Other (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,270 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a):Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets. On or about May 29, 2025, employees were working under upper level workers installing exterior wall panels to a residential home without utilizing head protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2270
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,270 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles. On or about May 29, 2025, employees were utilizing pneumatic nail guns to install exterior wall panels to a residential home without utilizing eye or face protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2270
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,270 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, or uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation. On or about May 29, 2025, employees were utilizing pumpjack scaffolding to install exterior wall panels to a residential home which was set up on the wet ground.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2270
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1):Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level was not protected from falling to that lower level. Instance A: On or about May 29, 2025, an employee was utilizing pumpjack scaffolding at the front of the house at heights above 10 feet to install exterior wall panels to a residential home without the use of fall protection. Instance B: On or about May 29, 2025, an employee was utilizing pumpjack scaffolding at the rear of the house at heights above 10 feet to install exterior wall panels to a residential home without the use of fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.452 J02
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,270 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2):Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary. Instance A: On or about May 29, 2025, employee at the front of the house was utilizing pumpjack scaffolding that was not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or the equivalent to install exterior wall panels to a residential home. Instance B: On or about May 29, 2025, employee at the rear of the house was utilizing pumpjack scaffolding that was not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or the equivalent to install exterior wall panels to a residential home.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2270
1926.1053 B13
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,270 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13):The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step. On or about May 29, 2025, an employee was using the top step of a stepladder as a step to pass material up to an upper level worker that was installing exterior wall panels to a residential home.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2270
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348274382.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.