EAU CLAIRE, WI —
OSHA Inspection: JOSE RIVERA
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOSE RIVERA in 937 WATER STREET, EAU CLAIRE, WI 54703 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348282963.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JOSE RIVERA
- Site address
- 937 WATER STREET
- City
- EAU CLAIRE
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54703
- Mailing
- 195 EDMUND AVE. W, APT. 234, SAINT PAUL, MN 55103
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Jul 28, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 3, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $398 · Current $398
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: (a) Citation 1, Item 1; an other-than-serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1)) with an abatement date of July 2, 2025. (b) Citation 1, Item 2; an other-than-serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10) with an abatement date of July 2, 2025. (c) Citation 1, Item 3; an other-than-serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) with an abatement date of July 2, 2025.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $398
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Jul 28, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 3, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $398 · Current $398
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required: (a) Citation 1, Item 2; an other-than-serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10) with an abatement date of July 2, 2025. (b) Citation 1, Item 3; an other-than-serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) with an abatement date of July 2, 2025.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $398
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jun 10, 2025
- Abate by
- Jul 2, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,128 · Current $2,128
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: (a) Commercial building rooftop, various locations; On or about June 2, 2025, employees were not required to wear eye protection to protect against flying particles while operating pneumatic nail guns to affix asphalt shingles using 1-1/2-inch coil roofing nails.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2128
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Jun 10, 2025
- Abate by
- Jul 2, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system: (a) Commercial building rooftop, various locations; On or about June 2, 2025, employees were not protected from falls, while engaged in roofing replacement activities from a 4:12 pitch roof and near edges, at heights ranging between approximately 21-feet, 8-inches to 28-feet, 7-inches above ground level.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jun 10, 2025
- Abate by
- Jul 2, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: (a) Commercial building rooftop, south side; On or about June 2, 2025, a 28-foot Werner brand model D6228-2 fiberglass extension ladder was leaned against the south-facing eave and used for rooftop access/egress where the landing surface was approximately 21-feet, 8-inches above ground-level. The upper side rails of the ladder did not extend at least 3-feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4965
More inspections at Jose Rivera
View Jose Rivera's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348282963.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.