OSHA Inspection: EGAMA ROOFING CORP

Issued

Oct 2, 2025

Penalty

Initial $2,837 · Current $1,986 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns.  Jobsite at 9 Central Avenue in Barrington:  a. On or about 6/3/2025, the employer did not ensure ground worker employees wore hard hats while working in areas where there were dangers of head injuries from impact of falling objects, including tools such as nails guns and building materials falling off the roof.

Issued

Oct 2, 2025

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure employees used eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.  Jobsite at 9 Central Avenue in Barrington:  a. On or about 6/3/2025, the employer did not ensure employees used adequate eye protection when exposed to eye/face hazards from flying particles/objects when installing roofing shingles using pneumatic nail guns.

Issued

Oct 2, 2025

Penalty

Initial $4,965 · Current $3,476 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employees provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b).  Jobsite at 9 Central Avenue in Barrington:  a. On or about 6/3/2025, the employer did not ensure employees were protected from fall hazards of approximately ten feet while installing a residential roof.

Issued

Oct 2, 2025

Penalty

Initial $2,837 · Current $1,986 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed.  Jobsite at 9 Central Avenue in Barrington:  a. On or about 6/3/2025, the employer did not ensure ladders used on the jobsite extended at least three feet above the upper landing where the employees accessed the roof, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards of approximately ten feet.

Issued

Oct 2, 2025

Penalty

Initial $398 · Current $279 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer.  Jobsite at 9 Central Avenue in Barrington:  a. On or about 6/3/2025, the employer did not ensure fall protection training was in compliance by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee(s) trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer prior to exposing employees to potential fall hazards such as working on roofs at heights of 10 feet and greater.