Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JUAN NAVA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JUAN NAVA in 2640 WINFREY PT, PROSPER, TX 75078 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348286253.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Juan Nava — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Juan Nava is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JUAN NAVA
Site address
2640 WINFREY PT
City
PROSPER
State
TX
ZIP
75078
Mailing
341 BROADVIEW DRIVE, GARLAND, TX 75043
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2025
Abate by
Oct 7, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,256 · Current $1,804 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1):Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  (a)	On or about June 3, 2025, employees doing roof work on a two stories single family residential house and using a Metabo nail gun without the use of safety glasses.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1804.2
  • — Z (S) $4256

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2025
Abate by
Oct 7, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $1,804 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:   On or about June 3, 2025, employees doing roof work on a two stories single family residential house of more than 6-feet did not have personal fall arrest system, guardrail system or safety net:  (a)	10-feet fall hazard (b)	20-feet fall hazard
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1804.2
  • — Z (S) $4965

View Juan Nava's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348286253.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.