LIBERTYVILLE, IL —
OSHA Inspection: METALEX, LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of METALEX, LLC in 700 LIBERTY DRIVE, LIBERTYVILLE, IL 60048 (NAICS 332322). OSHA activity number 348291469.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- METALEX, LLC
- Site address
- 700 LIBERTY DRIVE
- City
- LIBERTYVILLE
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60048
- Mailing
- 700 LIBERTY DRIVE, LIBERTYVILLE, IL 60048
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332322
- Employees
- 80
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 D
- Issued
- Aug 4, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 28, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $11,916 · Current $11,916
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d):The established procedure for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) did not cover the actions listed in and was not done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6): a) Press Room- On June 5, 2025, employees were exposed to machine hazards associated with moving parts when conducting die setting on press brakes, such as the Cincinnati Press Brake #137. The employer did not implement energy control application steps such as lockout tagout when performing die setting [per the 1910.147(d)(2) requirements]. As a result, the remaining applicable energy control elements, involving dissipation machine isolation [(d)(3)], LOTO device application [(d)(4)], dissipation of residual energy [(d)(5)(i)], and verification of isolation [(d)(6)], were not implemented to protect employees from machine servicing hazards. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement or other written records.
Recent events (2)
- — C (S) $11916
- — Z (S) $11916
1910.147 C06 I
- Issued
- Aug 4, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 28, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $11,916 · Current $11,916
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i):The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed: a)Facility wide - On June 05, 2025, the employer had not ensured that periodic inspections of the energy control procedures were conducted at least annually to ensure that the procedures and requirements of the energy control program were properly implemented and followed by employees while doing maintenance and repair on equipment facility wide. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement or other written records.
Recent events (2)
- — C (S) $11916
- — Z (S) $11916
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Aug 4, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 28, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $11,916 · Current $11,916
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii):Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): a) Warehouse- On or about June 05, 2025, the employer did not ensure that equipment, such as the Cincinnati Press Brake, was guarded in a manner that would prevent employees from having any part of their body near the point of operation during the operating cycle. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement or other written records.
Recent events (2)
- — C (S) $11916
- — Z (S) $11916
1910.305 G01 IV A
- Issued
- Aug 4, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,341 · Current $4,341
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A):Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure: (a) Warehouse- On June 05, 2025, an extension cord was used as a substitute for fixed wiring to supply power to fans, foot pedal and light curtain of Press Brake #146. No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
- — C (S) $4341
- — Z (S) $4341
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332322)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348291469.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.