MOKENA, IL —
OSHA Inspection: JOSE PEREZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOSE PEREZ in 13813 CYNTHIA LANE, MOKENA, IL 60448 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348294612.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JOSE PEREZ
- Site address
- 13813 CYNTHIA LANE
- City
- MOKENA
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60448
- Mailing
- 13117 W 21ST STREET, WADSWORTH, IL 60083
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Jan 15, 2026
- Abate by
- Feb 20, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $319 · Current $319
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1):Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section. a. On or about January 15, 2026, the employer did not certify to OSHA within 10 days after the abatement date that each of the following cited violations issued had been corrected: Citation Number Item Number Abatement Date 01 003 12/12/2025
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $319
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,838 · Current $2,838
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: a) On or about June 3, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not ensure that protective eye equipment was used when employees were conducting roof activities using pneumatic nail guns exposing them to flying object hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2838
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,972 · Current $3,972
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) On or about June 3, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing residential roofing activities between eight (8) feet and eighteen (18) feet above the ground, were not protected from falls, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3972
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2025
- Abate by
- Dec 12, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,838 · Current $2,838
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a) On or about June 3, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not provide fall protection training to enable employees to recognize and control the fall hazards at their worksite while performing residential construction activities. Employees were exposed to fall hazards between eight (8) feet and eighteen (18) feet from the roof's edge to the ground.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2838
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $1,702 · Current $1,702
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns: a) On or about June 3, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not ensure employees were protected from overhead hazards by wearing head protection while working in an area where overhead roofing activities were being performed.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1702
1926.1053 B22
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2025
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,270 · Current $2,270
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(22): Employees using ladders were carrying objects or loads that could cause them to lose balance and fall: a) On or about June 3, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not ensure employees were using ladders in a safe manner exposing employees to fall hazards while carrying objects up the ladder that could cause them to fall.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2270
More inspections at Jose Perez
View Jose Perez's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348294612.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.