TENAFLY, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: MALIX GROUP LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MALIX GROUP LLC in 238 OXFORD DRIVE, TENAFLY, NJ 07670 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 348302258.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MALIX GROUP LLC
- Site address
- 238 OXFORD DRIVE
- City
- TENAFLY
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07670
- Mailing
- 762 NORTH 6TH STREET, NEWARK, NJ 07107
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Dec 8, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):The employer did not ensure employees used eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a) Attic frame: Employees were exposed to eye injuries while framing with a pneumatic nail gun, without the use of eye and face protection, on or about 6/11/25. b) Attic frame: An employee was exposed to eye injuries while using a hand held skill saw, without the use of eye and face protection, on or about 6/11/25. c) Attic frame: An employee was exposed to eye injuries while using a pneumatic nail gun, without the use of eye and face protection, on or about 6/11/25.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.602 D
- Issued
- Dec 8, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.602(d):The employer did not ensure that each employee operating a powered industrial vehicle had been trained and evaluated as required by paragraph 29 CFR 1910.178(l):Note: The requirements applicable to construction work under paragraph (d) of this section are identical to those set forth at paragraph (l) of 29 CFR 1910.178. and as referenced by the note contained in 1926.602(d). a) Front of the residential home: An employee was operating an all terrain powered industrial vehicle, without being trained and evaluated as required, on or about 6/11/25
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Dec 8, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $33,103 · Current $33,103
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) Residential home frame/attic: Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 20 feet to the ground below while working on the attic frame of a residential home without the use of personal fall arrest system or any other means of fall protection in place, on or about 6/11/25.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (W) $33103
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348302258.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.