SHOREWOOD, WI —
OSHA Inspection: GEOVANNIE VARGAS CRUZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GEOVANNIE VARGAS CRUZ in 2821 E. MENLO BLVD, SHOREWOOD, WI 53211 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348319765.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GEOVANNIE VARGAS CRUZ
- Site address
- 2821 E. MENLO BLVD
- City
- SHOREWOOD
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53211
- Mailing
- 1750 S. 60TH STREET, MILWAUKEE, WI 53214
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Sep 4, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $3,547
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2):The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s). (a) On or about June 17, 2025, the employer did not ensure that frequent and regular jobsite inspection were conducted to ensure employees were protected from hazards associated with their work. Hazards identified on the jobsite include but not limited to lack of training, incorrect setup of an extension ladder, and no fall protection equipment installed.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3547
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 4, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,256 · Current $4,256
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b). (a) On or about June 17, 2025, the employer did not ensure that employees performing re-roofing on a single-story garage roof were protected from falling to the ground below. This exposed employees to a fall hazard of approximately 8.5 feet onto roofing material and concrete.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4256
1926.502 D17
- Issued
- Sep 4, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 23, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17): The attachment point of the body harness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head. (a) On or about June 17, 2025, the employer did not identify and correct employees securing fall protection ropes to the front of their harnesses. This exposed the employees to spinal injuries in the event of a fall.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Sep 4, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. (a) On or about June 17, 2025, the employer had not ensured that employees performing roofing work had been trained to recognize and minimize the fall hazards associated with their work, and to install and utilize fall protection equipment correctly. This exposed employees to a fall hazard of approximately 8.5 feet.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Sep 4, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 23, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,837 · Current $2,837
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed. (a) On or about June 17, 2025, the employer did not ensure the extension ladder used by employees to access and egress a residential roof was extended at least three feet above the upper landing, exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 8.5 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2837
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348319765.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.