Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GEOVANNIE VARGAS CRUZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GEOVANNIE VARGAS CRUZ in 2821 E. MENLO BLVD, SHOREWOOD, WI 53211 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348319765.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Geovannie Vargas Cruz — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Geovannie Vargas Cruz is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2821 E. MENLO BLVD
City
SHOREWOOD
State
WI
ZIP
53211
Mailing
1750 S. 60TH STREET, MILWAUKEE, WI 53214
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2025
Abate by
Sep 30, 2025
Penalty
Initial $3,547 · Current $3,547
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(2):The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s).  (a) On or about June 17, 2025, the employer did not ensure that frequent and regular jobsite inspection were conducted to ensure employees were protected from hazards associated with their work. Hazards identified on the jobsite include but not limited to lack of training, incorrect setup of an extension ladder, and no fall protection equipment installed.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3547

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2025
Abate by
Sep 30, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,256 · Current $4,256
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b).  (a) On or about June 17, 2025, the employer did not ensure that employees performing re-roofing on a single-story garage roof were protected from falling to the ground below.  This exposed employees to a fall hazard of approximately 8.5 feet onto roofing material and concrete.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4256

1926.502 D17

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2025
Abate by
Sep 23, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(17): The attachment point of the body harness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head.  (a) On or about June 17, 2025, the employer did not identify and correct employees securing fall protection ropes to the front of their harnesses. This exposed the employees to spinal injuries in the event of a fall.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2025
Abate by
Sep 30, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  (a) On or about June 17, 2025, the employer had not ensured that employees performing roofing work had been trained to recognize and minimize the fall hazards associated with their work, and to install and utilize fall protection equipment correctly. This exposed employees to a fall hazard of approximately 8.5 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2025
Abate by
Sep 23, 2025
Penalty
Initial $2,837 · Current $2,837
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed.  (a) On or about June 17, 2025, the employer did not ensure the extension ladder used by employees to access and egress a residential roof was extended at least three feet above the upper landing, exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 8.5 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2837

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348319765.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.