HAMILTON, OH —
OSHA Inspection: RODRIGO ESPINOZA
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RODRIGO ESPINOZA in 801 CARLISLE DR, HAMILTON, OH 45013 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348322405.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RODRIGO ESPINOZA
- Site address
- 801 CARLISLE DR
- City
- HAMILTON
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45013
- Mailing
- 621 WEBSTER RD, INDEPENDENCE, KY 41051
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,405 · Current $3,405
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): Accident prevention responsibilities. Such programs shall provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers. a) On or about June 20, 2025, the employer did not conduct adequate inspections of the job site. Employees were exposed to fall heights greater than 8 feet in that conventional fall protection was not being worn while performing roofing work.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3405
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,405 · Current $3,405
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. a) On or before June 20, 2025, the employer failed to ensure that employees performing roofing on a residential home were utilizing a fall protection system. Employees were exposed to fall heights greater than 10 ft.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3405
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348322405.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.