NEW BEDFORD, MA ·
OSHA Inspection: DANNY ARITA
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of DANNY ARITA in 25 VIALL STREET, NEW BEDFORD, MA 02744 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 348329541.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DANNY ARITA
- Site address
- 25 VIALL STREET
- City
- NEW BEDFORD
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02744
- Mailing
- 132-134 PARK STREET, NEW BEDFORD, MA 02740
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238170
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Jun 5, 2026
- Abate by
- Jun 24, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $319 · Current $319
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: On or about 06/05/2026, the employer failed to submit certification of corrective action for citation 1, items 1a, 1b, 2, 3, 4a, 4b, and 5, issued on 8/22/25, with an abatement due date of 9/2/25 (1-1-a through 1-4-b) and 9/10/25 (1-5).
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $319
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Aug 22, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 2, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,469 · Current $4,469
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a):Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns: Location: Job Site On or about June 24, 2025, two workers on the ground near a scaffold, where workers were working on a scaffold 30' from the ground, were not wearing hardhats, exposing the workers to head injuries from debris thrown or falling to the ground.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4469
1926.451 A06
- Issued
- Aug 22, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 2, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6):Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person: Location: Job site On or about June 24, 2025, an aluminum pump jack scaffold with two workers working 30' from the ground, was not designed by a qualified person, exposing employees to falls.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1926.451 C03
- Issued
- Aug 22, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 2, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,469 · Current $4,469
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(3):Supported scaffold poles, legs, post, frames, and/or uprights were not plumb and braced to prevent swaying and displacement:
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4469
1926.451 F06
- Issued
- Aug 22, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 2, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,469 · Current $4,469
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(6):Scaffolds were erected, used, dismantled, altered, or moved such that they, or any conductive material handled on them, could have come closer than the minimum distances established for specific voltages as set forth in the table in subparagraph (f)(6). Location: Job site On or about June 24, 2025, two workers were working on an aluminum pump jack scaffold 30' from the ground, whose aluminum support pole was within ten feet of an electrical service line carrying less than 300 volts, exposing the workers to electric shock and electrocution.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4469
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Aug 22, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 2, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,469 · Current $4,469
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1):Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section: Location: Job Site On or about June 24, 2025, two workers, working from a scaffold without fall protection, were exposed to 30' falls.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4469
1926.451 G02
- Issued
- Aug 22, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 2, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(2):The employer did not have a competent person determine the feasibility and safety of providing fall protection for employees erecting or dismantling supported scaffolds: Location: Job Site On or about June 24, 2025, workers erected a scaffold without a competent person determining the feasibility and safety of providing fall protection, exposing employees working 30' from the ground to falls.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Aug 22, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 10, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,469 · Current $4,469
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a):The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. Location: Job Site On or about June 24, 2025, two workers were working on a scaffold 30' from the ground and had not been trained by a qualified person to recognize the hazards associated with the pump scaffold being used.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4469
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 348329541.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.